Press Release:  The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) has awarded research, education and extension grants to 24 institutions to reduce food-borne illnesses and deaths from microbial contamination.

“While the U.S. food supply is generally considered to be one of the safest in the world, approximately 48 million Americans become sick each year due to food-borne illnesses,” said Catherine Woteki, USDA Chief Scientist and Under Secretary for Research, Education and Economics. “These grants support the development of a more complete understanding of the sources and implications of microbial contamination and will promote the adoption of new food safety strategies and technologies. The goal is to greatly improve the safety of our food supply and ultimately save lives.”

Projects were funded in Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Texas, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin. Highlights include:

· A project in Iowa to examine the factors contributing to the appearance of staph bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus) on raw meat and study the relationship between meat contamination and human staph infections.

· A project in Washington State to expand the commercial possibilities of microwave technologies for the control of harmful bacterial and viral pathogens in packaged foods, particularly ready-to-eat foods, deli meats, and seafoods.

· A project in Florida to identify the specific Salmonella genes that allow the bacteria to attach to and persist on tomatoes.

A full list of awardees can be found online at:

The grants are awarded through USDA’s Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI) and administered through NIFA. AFRI food safety grants promote and enhance the scientific discipline of food safety, with an overall aim of protecting consumers from microbial, chemical, and physical hazards that may occur during all stages of the food chain, from production to consumption.

AFRI is NIFA’s flagship competitive grant program and was established under the 2008 Farm Bill. AFRI supports work in six priority areas: plant health and production and plant products; animal health and production and animal products; food safety, nutrition and health; renewable energy, natural resources and environment; agriculture systems and technology; and agriculture economics and rural communities.

Through federal funding and leadership for research, education and extension programs, USDA’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture focuses on investing in science and solving critical issues impacting people’s daily lives and the nation’s future. More information is available at:

  • G. Ann Talbot

    It is heartwarming that the USDA is implementing the funding of research at all these wonderful universities as outlined in the 2008 Farm Bill. Most of these universities receive grants from the industry giants who’s CAFOs and industrial farming modalities are causing of the sad state of our mass food supply and delivery industry in America. It will be interesting to see the finding published from these studies.
    It would also be heartwarming if the USDA would implement the Fair Farm Rules portion of the 2008 Farm Bill, which these industry giants have fought since the bill passed.
    It seems time, money and effort is wasted spinning wheels and nothing substantive accomplished.

  • Carl Custer

    And yet NIFA and others are being cut see:
    · A reduction of $126 million from the U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute for Food and Agriculture’s (NIFA) FY 2010 level of $1.4 billion. Special Research Grants were cut by $86 million and food safety by $3.6 million. The Agriculture Research Service is cut by $64 million. The Agriculture and Food Research Initiative was funded at $264.5 million, a small increase compared to the FY 2010 level of $262.5 million. HR 1 would have cut AFRI by $35 million.
    · The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) would be funded at about $5.7 billion, a cut of $740 million from the FY 2010 level. HR 1 would have cut CDC by an additional $681 million.
    · A reduction of $321.6 million, 1% below FY 2010, for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), including a $210 million pro rata cut from institutes, centers and the office of the director, a $50 million cut for NIH buildings and facilities, and a $61.6 million cut from the 0.2% rescission against nondefense programs. HR 1 would have cut NIH by $1.6 billion. The NIH budget for FY 2011 is about $30.6 billion.
    · A reduction of $53 million, plus the 0.2% rescission, 1% below FY 2010, for the National Science Foundation (NSF); a $6.9 billion budget was approved for NSF for FY 2011. NSF research would receive a cut of about $43 million and $10 million would be cut from education and human resources. HR 1 would have cut NSF by about $360 million.