No Change in Agency for Regulated Foods

Only foods already regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will be subject to S. 510. Section 403 maintains the existing firewall between FDA and the U.S. Department of Agriculture regulated foods and agricultural products.

No Change in Definition of Facility

Under the Bioterrorism Act of 2002, certain food businesses were considered “facilities” and had to register with FDA. Farms and restaurants were exempted. This definition is not changed in S. 510. If an entity does not need to register now, it will not need to register under S. 510.

Flexibility for Small Businesses

Small businesses are given regulatory flexibility throughout S. 510. For example, small processors are given additional time to comply with new food safety practices and guidelines created by the bill and the Secretary may modify or exempt small processors from new hazard analysis and preventive control requirements based on size and risk. The legislation also requires the FDA to publish several user-friendly small entity compliance guides to assist firms with the implementation of new practices.

Scale Appropriate Produce Safety Standards

In coordination with the Secretary of Agriculture, FDA develops science-based standards for the safe production and harvesting of fruits and vegetables. Priority is given to specific fruits and vegetables that have the highest risk of food borne illness outbreaks. Flexibility is given for different growing, production, and harvesting techniques. FDA has the discretion to limit produce safety standards for small and very small entities that produce or harvest food which pose little or no serious risk to human health. Consideration is also given to conservation and environmental standards already established by federal natural resource and wildlife agencies. Exemptions are also available for low risk commodities. FDA must minimize the burden of paperwork and, as appropriate, the number of separate standards for separate foods.

Increased Training Opportunities

The bill requires FDA to coordinate with the extension activities of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture in educating growers and small processors about any new practices required by S. 510. Necessary funds are authorized to conduct these extension activities. The bill also provides for the training and education of state, local, and tribal authorities to facilitate the implementation of new standards under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act. Competitive grants are made available, for up to 3 years, to support these efforts to enhance education, training, and technical assistance.

Risk-Based Traceability

The ability to trace back potentially unsafe food in the event of a food-borne illness outbreak is important. For the purpose of traceability, farms and small businesses that are not food facilities are not expected to create new records. During an active investigation of a foodborne illness outbreak, in consultation with state and local officials, the Secretary may ask a farm to identify potential immediate recipients of food if it is necessary to protect public health or mitigate a foodborne illness outbreak. Limitations are also included for restaurants, commingled agricultural commodities, direct to consumer sales, fishing vessels and products carrying an identity preserved label.

Regulatory Flexibility for Organic Foods

Throughout the bill, consideration is given to the unique agricultural practices and requirements of organic foods under the Organic Foods Production Act of 1990. 

Protections for Farmers Markets, Cottage Industries and Direct Farm-to-Market Sales

Small entities that produce food for their own consumption or market the majority of their food directly to consumers or restaurants are not subject to registration or new recordkeeping requirements under S. 510. This includes food sold through farmers’ markets, bake sales, public events and organizational fundraisers.

  • Harry Hamil

    It was reported in “The Hill” that this “guide” is circulating on Capitol Hill.
    Apparently, it appeared no later than the same day as the Manager’s package of S 510. The fact that it appeared so quickly and is anonymous is very fishy to me.
    I would like very much to know who wrote it.
    And, unsurprising to me, it is much more of a promotional piece that it is a “guide.” Plus, it reminds me of a similar piece with no shown authorship put out about the previous version of S 510.

  • Doc Mudd

    Never satisfied, diehard opponents of S.510 continue to nitpick and fantasize (must be a conspiracy of some fishy sort, eh?)

  • Doreen

    I notice there is no mention of the additional power to regulate dairy farms given in the ‘new unimproved’ version of 510.
    I’ve not had time to read the entire new bill, but it still leaves the change of ‘credible evidence’ to ‘reason to believe’. It still exempts the secretary’s ruling from judicial review, it still gives blaket authorization to write regs based on international agreements.
    For those reasons alone, anyone with any understanding of agriculture should be against it. The FDA already has the authority it needs to inspect the processing plants with the problems. The USDA already has that authority as well, and neither agency is doing their job, so why should their authority over more entities be expanded?
    If what is offered as ‘truth’ above is accurate, why is there a S510 at all?

  • Nolo’s Small Business Legal Guide is included to guide you through common legal questions. Food Processors Wholesale

  • big government sucks

    The problems are being caused by Big Agribusiness folks (food travelling 3,000 miles and produced in disgusting &/or Supersized facilities is ASKING for illness on logistics alone!), yet its the SMALL folk who have to grab their ankles? S. 510 is shillspeak for Big Business against the little guy and the average person.

    The safety that comes from the 100-mile diet (diy/small) is competing with the establishment of business bueracracy, hence this bill that HAMSTRINGS the operations of Sustainable agricultural!

    With Peak Oil and climatary turbulence upon us + doubling world population, it is sadistic Irony to hamstring farmers markets and other newly “green” people! People will come up with a Plan B, regardless of what big business says about it.

    Vote HELL THE HECK NO on this vampiric s. 510! Liberty is a virtue. Red tape misdirected at the is not!

    100 mile diet + permaculture is what the earth/we need to allign with :)