February 2009

The number of ill persons identified in each state is as follows: Alabama (2), Arizona (12), Arkansas (5), California (74), Colorado (13), Connecticut (9), Georgia (6), Hawaii (4), Idaho (15), Illinois (6), Indiana (7), Iowa (3), Kansas (2), Kentucky (3), Maine (4), Maryland (8), Massachusetts (47), Michigan (30), Minnesota (36), Missouri (12), Mississippi (6), Nebraska

By Ann Bagel Storck on 2/6/2009

As buzz abounds around who will be the next under secretary of USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service, Bill Marler’s name frequently has been part of the conversation.

The Seattle-based attorney, managing partner at Marler Clark LLP, is best known for his food-borne illness cases, but he also speaks

Salmonella Contamination Hearing
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
10:00 a.m. February 11, 2009
2123 Rayburn House Office Building

I have been asked to bring some clients from the recent Salmonella outbreak to Washington DC to give the Subcommittee a flavor of what it is like for your child to eat peanut butter and watch your

Thursday, February 05 2009, 10:00am – 12:00pm

Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition & Forestry

Examination of Federal Food Safety Oversight in the Wake of Peanut Products Recall

Date: Thursday, February 5, 2009

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Place: 216 Hart Senate Office Building

Panel I

Dr. Stephen Sundlof
Director, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for
Food

I am looking forward to sending subpoeans to the "food safety" auditors of Peanut Corporation of America.  Again, save those documents all.

For weeks now, I have been hammering on all involved in this outbreak for full disclosure and transparency. Now, bit, by painful bit, the facts are slowly coming out. The sixth item on

You have to be kidding?

According to Stars and Stripes – Europe-bound bulk meals used by U.S. military personnel contain peanut butter products that are part of a massive recall because of possible salmonella contamination.  The U.S. military has pulled commercial products from store shelves and also from Unitized Group Rations-A, or what old-timers might

When foodborne illness outbreaks occur, the source of the contamination is not always clear. Lawyers pursuing foodborne illness claims must carefully determine the applicable laws and identify the party that brought the product to market.

These days, ready-to-eat produce is more popular than ever. Unfortunately for the American populace, prepackaged produce often carries a risk of harboring foodborne pathogens. Due to large-scale production and distribution, prepackaged produce that is tainted has the potential to affect thousands of consumers. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), foodborne illness kills 5,000 people in the United States every year.1

With the advancing sophistication of scientific detection and investigation methods, one can hope that the root causes of food product defects will be easier to identify in the years to come. In the interim, the legal system remains the only avenue of recovery for consumers injured by foodborne diseases.
The United States has seen several foodborne illness outbreaks in recent years, including a 2008 salmonella outbreak linked to raw tomatoes and peppers that sickened 1,442 people in 43 states,2 a 2006 E. coli outbreak that was later linked to Dole brand baby spinach and resulted in 204 confirmed E. coli cases,3 and a 2002 E. coli outbreak linked to ConAgra brand ground beef, in which nearly 19 million pounds of beef were recalled.4 Perhaps the most well-known foodborne illness outbreak in the United States was a 1993 E. coli outbreak associated with the Jack in the Box restaurant chain that left more than 700 people ill and four children dead.5

Every foodborne illness outbreak presents unique circumstances. The 2006 Dole outbreak was notable, however, for the FDA’s success in tracing the source of the contamination to a particular growing area and finding the outbreak strain present there. The Dole outbreak highlights some of the essential steps to conducting food products liability litigation, including determining the applicable body of law, the entities subject to strict liability, the indemnity and insurance issues involved, the role third-party defendants might play, and the extent to which the defendant knew about the risk of contamination.Continue Reading FEATURE – American Association of Justice Trial Magazine – “Serving up trouble” – William D. Marler Esq.

Another press release from Peanut Corporation of America:

There has been a great deal of confusing and misleading information in the media. We want the public to know that there were regular visits and inspections of the Blakely facility by federal and state regulators in 2008. Independent audit and food safety firms also conducted customary