End of Pollan Book Controversy - Omnivore's Dilemma to be read on WSU Campus

Attorney says higher education needs citizen leadership

As Ann Strosnider, reporter for the Kitsap Sun, said in her story Attorney says higher education needs citizen leadership, I told a luncheon gathering of Olympic College supporters Monday that higher education faces a crisis in Washington state, and the state Legislature refuses to show any leadership.

"The stakes are enormous," the Bainbridge Island resident said, and that's why it's so important that citizens take matters into their own hands.

I spoke at the annual community luncheon, kicking off the campaign to raise funds for the Olympic College Foundation. The goal for the 2004-05 school year is to raise $150,000 for scholarships, programs and capital projects.


While the University of Washington and WSU are proud of the high grade-point averages of incoming freshmen, they are actually a barrier for many students.

"This year you had to have a 3.6 gpa to get into WSU or the UW," he said. "If that had been the requirement when I went to WSU, I would not be standing here today. ... College can't be just for the rich and those with a 4.0."

I'm a strong supporter of Initiative 884, which would raise state sales tax by 1 cent to create a $1 billion education trust fund for preschool, kindergarten through high school education and higher education. It would fund an additional 25,000 college and technical school enrollments and extend state Promise Scholarships to the top 30 percent of graduating high school classes.

"We've been pandered to for so long with the story that it's better to keep our money for ourselves," Marler told the gathering. "Now I have to ask, what are you doing to help? Will you show leadership?"

Kiga appointed UW regent

Fred Kiga, Gov. Gary Locke's former revenue director and chief of staff, has been appointed to the University of Washington Board of Regents.

Another close Locke ally, Bill Marler of Bainbridge Island, was appointed by the governor to the Higher Education Coordinating Board. Marler, a lawyer and a key member of Locke's "kitchen cabinet," will leave his post as a regent of Washington State University. No successor on the WSU board was named.
I will succeed state economist Chang Mook Sohn, whose term was limited. I'll serve a four-year term.

Washington State U. Regents hire new president

Dean Hare of University Wire has reported that Washington State U. Regents have hired a new president. Rafael Stone was confirmed as new president of the Washington State University Board of Regents on May 7. Elizabeth A. Cowles was named vice president. I served as president in 2003-4, after being reappointed by Governor Gary Locke in 2003, and will serve on the board until 2009.

Stone said one major disappointment arising from his time on the Board of Regents is salaries for faculty. "We are constantly trying to push this in Olympia," Stone said.

Marler said the most important issue he dealt with last year was signing President V. Lane Rawlins to a new contract.

Washington State U. faculty react to pay raise

As Catherine Toolson's University Wire story Washington State U. faculty react to pay raise reports, the Washington State University Board of Regents approved a large salary increase for President V. Lane Rawlins on May 7. Rawlins currently earns a base wage of $254,065 per year. Beginning June 1, his base salary will be upped to $300,000 per year.

The board wished to keep Rawlins' salary competitive with the presidents of comparable institutions, said Board of Regents President William Marler. Marler credits Rawlins for building an administrative structure that has held together despite decreasing state support and tremendous fiscal pressure.

"That was important, as he's one of our best assets," Marler said. "He's one of the best presidents in the country. What we are paying him is still a bargain."


Some WSU faculty members question the timing and amount of the pay raise, but the Board of Regents members were adamant about instituting the salary increase.
"I feel that the raise is justified if you look at what my peers are making, but I am concerned that most staff and faculty have received very little," Rawlins said. "I have expressed this concern to the regents and the legislature. I am uncomfortable receiving such an increase at a time when most of our employees are not, and I have expressed this feeling several times. On two occasions I turned down raises. This time, the regents were more insistent."

Initiatives have early momentum; November: Four committees have raised $130,000-plus

As Kenneth Vogel of the News Tribune reported in his article Initiatives have early momentum; November: Four committees have raised $130,000-plus, four initiative committees this week reported raising more than $130,000 each - a sign that the measures they're supporting have a legitimate shot at appearing on the November ballot.

Investor Nicolas Hanauer and a law firm co-owned by Locke ally Bill Marler contributed $125,000 of the $146,000 raised by the committee backing the education sales-tax initiative, I-884, which Locke supports.

I-884 would increase the sales tax by 1 percent to raise $1 billion for education.

Locke may kill funding for Riverpoint project; Veto of $31.6 million for new building possible;

This morning, Richard Roesler of the Spokesman Review reported that Locke may kill funding for Riverpoint project, which would spend $31.6 million this year to build the shell of a combination library, classroom and office building at Washington State University's downtown Riverpoint campus.

But Locke, who months ago proposed $6.6 million toward the project, is considering a line-item veto, which means WSU would get nothing for the project this year.

Spokane Mayor Jim West has reportedly called Locke's office. WSU president V. Lane Rawlins and regent Bill Marler wrote a letter Tuesday. Regent Chris Marr has been talking to Locke's staff. Marr said in Spokane Wednesday that Locke was concerned about WSU's commitment to the nursing program at Riverpoint.

Campaign launched for education trust fund; Initiative, which would raise sales tax by 1 cent, needs 200,000 signatures;

As Becky Kramer reported for the Spokesman Review in her article Campaign launched for education trust fund, with more than 200,000 signatures to collect by July 2, the League of Education Voters is starting to fire up its initiative campaign. After a year of collecting input from parents, educators, business people and community members throughout the state, the group has developed a proposal that would generate a dedicated stream of money for all levels of public education.

Money would come from a 1-cent increase in the state sales tax rate, which would bring the state rate to 7.5 percent. Local taxes are added on top of that, so the actual sales tax in Spokane, for instance, would increase from 8.1 percent to 9.1 percent.


Among other things, the education trust fund would:

  • Create 10,000 new spaces for high-needs preschoolers.
  • Fully fund Initiative 728 - approved by voters in 2000 but scaled back by
    the Legislature - which reduces class sizes.
  • Provide incentives for teachers to obtain professional skill development.
  • Provide 25,000 more enrollments at community and technical colleges and
    universities.
  • Expand Promise Scholarships and financial aid.
  • Bill's Keynote Address at Washington State University's

    I left Pullman in the spring of 1982 with bachelor's degrees in English, economics and political science with the goal of never looking back.

    But, similar to many students who have made that vow, I did come back - more often than ever since 1997 when Gov. Gary Locke appointed me to the WSU Board of Regents.

    I have found that while the academic reputation of my alma mater continues to improve, some trends have not been for the better.

    When I graduated in 1982, tuition was $1,060 ($1,918 in today's dollars). My debt leaving WSU was less than $500. Today tuition is $4,836 and the average debt of a graduate is $19,700.

    In 1982 faculty salaries at WSU ranked somewhat below the middle in relation to comparable universities. Today we are near the bottom. The gap between WSU faculty salaries and the top 25th percentile has grown from $3,000 to $14,000 per year and the gap with the average has grown from $2,000 to $11,000.

    Per student appropriations have fallen 25 percent since 1991. State appropriations now are only 29 percent of the WSU budget, tuition amounts to 14 percent and the remaining 57 percent comes from grants and other sources. We are quickly becoming a private institution by default and neglect.

    Since 1997, I have voted to raise tuition six times - an increase of 40%. Raise tuition on the backs of the students and parents, or cut services, salaries, staff and quality. This is not what I signed up for.

    Higher education's response to decreasing support and increased demand has been the slamming doors of higher tuition and of required higher GPA's and SAT's.

    WSU is proud that its 2003 entering freshman class had an average GPA of nearly 3.6. If this had been the standard when I arrived in 1977, I would not have been admitted. My life-changing experience of attending WSU would, quite simply, not have happened.

    So, where are we headed?

    In 1997, Gov. Locke appointed many outstanding state leaders to the 2020 Commission, which looked at what our higher education system needed in the coming decades.

    According to the commission's report, we will need places for 100,000 more college and university students in 2020 than we needed in 1998. That is more than two new WSUs and one new UW combined.

    The 2020 commission report stated: "The higher education system benefits the public as a whole by stimulating economic growth and innovation, by nurturing our artistic and cultural life, and by preparing successive generations of our leaders."

    So, what did the commission say was necessary to fulfill these goals? Increase the capacity of the higher education system so that all Washington residents who want to learn will have access to education. And maintain funding at or above the average of per-student funding of similar institutions in other states.

    Commissioners stated in 1998: "The need to expand capacity is immediate. The demographic bulge is beginning to graduate from high school NOW. The economy is demanding more highly skilled workers NOW. Employers have high-skilled jobs unfilled NOW. These statistics were supported by the Higher Education Coordinating Board's 2004 report which shows a need for places for an additional 30,000 by 2010.

    The report continued: "Failing to address this shortfall would deny opportunity to Washington residents, starve our industries of qualified employees, and lead to the deterioration of public institutions. The stakes are enormous. If we try to ︶ust get by' we will consign our state and its people to economic decline and social division."

    These are strong words from a report that has gathered dust in Olympia for the last five years.

    Ultimately this is all about money and our collective will to look to the future.

    So, is there hope? I believe that the answer is yes. However, we need to look to ourselves for leadership.

    Recently, the UW and WSU Boards of Regents approved a resolution to cap freshman and transfer enrollments, until there is a substantial move to fund higher education at a level that puts quality and access first.

    Meanwhile, a group of individuals (including myself) from K-12, community colleges, the regional colleges and the research institutions has been working to put an educational initiative on the ballot in 2004. The initiative would raise sales taxes 1 cent and raise over $1 billion a year to invest in K-12 and higher education.

    For higher education alone it would raise $100 million a year to invest in research to save lives and spur economic growth, $175 million a year to allow more high school graduates to attend community college and four-year institutions, $75 million a year to train workers in new technologies and $50 million a year for scholarships.

    Some politicians feel that the public will not support a tax increase. But when 100,000 otherwise qualified kids cannot get the education they deserve in the coming decades, we will look back and wish we had shown courage and leadership.

    No one likes to pay taxes. However, it is time for us all to step up and do what is right for out kids' futures. If it is not us, then who? If not now, then when? Leadership is in our hands. It is up to us to decide what to do with it.

    William Marler is a Seattle attorney, president of the WSU Board of Regents and father of three. This article was adapted from his speech to December commencement at WSU Pullman.

    Education plan faces uncertain fate Some insist voters won't approve tax hike

    Richard Roesler of the Spokesman Review reported today in his story Education plan faces uncertain fate, that the League of Education Voters has proposed a one-penny sales tax hike which would raise $1 billion a year for schools.

    As the Spokesman Review reported today:

    Washington State University Regent Bill Marler said he was surprised that recent polls showed as much support as they did. Voters are particularly supportive, he said, when told that the League proposal sets up a firewall around the money, so it can't be drained off for other state budget needs.

    ''Anytime you ask people to raise their taxes it's going to be hard," he said. ''But voters have got to look at this and realize the time has come."

    A baby-boom echo of more than 30,000 new college students is on its way in coming years, he said, and the state has to make room for them. Already, he said, WSU is turning away some students with 3.5 grade-point averages.

    Some republicans are calling the proposition unrealistic, irresponsible and reckless. Critics are also pointing to the regressive nature of the sales tax, which tends to cost the poor a higher percentage of their income than the rich.

    Marler agreed that the sales tax is regressive, but said the money would help pay for scholarships, other financial aid, and education to help lift kids from poverty.

    Plus, he said, the simple one-penny proposal had the most voter support of several alternatives.

    ''We polled an income tax, we polled all kinds of taxes," he said. ''This seemed fairer to voters."

    COLLEGE CRISIS PUTS POTENTIAL STUDENTS AT RISK

    As the president of WSU's Board of Regents, I'm seeing first hand the damage being done by the current college funding crisis. As school budgets are cut, qualified students are turned away.

    As Jake Ellison of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer reported today in his article College crisis puts potential students at risk, colleges in this state already have nearly 16,000 more students than they receive state money for. In the last legislative session, $112 million was cut from the higher ed system, and community colleges took a $12 million hit.

    University and college officials, business leaders, state lawmakers and leading citizens have all used the word to describe the perfect storm converging on the system.

    "We are headed into a situation where we're using the blunt instrument of GPAs and SATs to deny admissions at a time when more people are wanting in and more need more education," said Bill Marler, president of Washington State University's Board of Regents.

    "I didn't sign up to be a regent to create a college environment where only students with straight A's and high SATs get to go to college," he said. "It's beyond me why we as a public are allowing this to occur."

    A rare commencement speaker points to failure

    Idaho state government earned notoriety two years ago when it cut its higher education budget by 10 percent. As draconian as that was, however, Idaho's college and university system has not seen the reductions that Washington's has. In the Evergreen State, the cuts have been more gradual, but more relentless.

    Too many Washingtonians are unaware of the depth of the wounds left by the budget ax. Too bad they weren't all in attendance at Washington State University's mid-year commencement ceremony Saturday.

    There, onetime WSU student activist and current Regent Bill Marler leveled with graduates about what state government and voters alike have done to the school and its sister institutions. In Marler's words, they have "more than turned their back on supporting higher education."

    As they have done that, programs have been curtailed, faculty salaries have slipped in comparison with other schools and student tuition has risen to the point that a higher education is, in Marler's words, for "only the wealthy, only the privileged few."

    "This is not world class, face to face," Marler said, in mockery of the slogan WSU adopted a few years back.

    It sure isn't. And the reasons for that are as varied as they are inescapable.

    Among them is a citizen tax revolt orchestrated by Marler's fellow, less responsible WSU grad, Tim Eyman. As Eyman's initiatives have strangled the flow from certain revenue streams, legislators have been forced to compensate by cutting elsewhere in the state budget.

    In addition, paralysis caused by legislative chambers evenly or nearly evenly split between political parties has left the Legislature without the ability to move decisively.

    Contributing to that stalemate has been a governor more given to getting along than to pointing the way. For all his strengths, Gary Locke has failed to marshal his fellow Washingtonians to join him in the kind of initiatives that former Gov. Dan Evans was known for. And this year, he didn't even try, proposing a state budget without additional revenue to make up for money lost to Eyman initiatives.

    Ultimately, though, it is hard to see how Washington's higher education classes will approach world class while the state remains crippled by the lack of an income tax. That tax should serve as the strongest leg of the three-legged stool that supports most states, including property and sales taxes.

    Marler challenged graduates to work to reverse the state's abandonment of higher education themselves, telling them, "There is more leadership right here, right now than in Olympia." Hell, judging from the state's treatment of higher ed, there might be more leadership in Albion than there is in Olympia.

    Regents freeze new enrollments; Move is response to reduced state funding;

    As the Spokesman Review reported in its article Regents freeze new enrollments, in response to reduced state funding, Washington State University and University of Washington have decided to freeze the number of new freshmen and transfer students accepted effective immediately.

    ''All you do is start cramming more kids in larger classes and teaching
    with more TAs (teaching assistants). People start saying 'What am I paying for?"' said Bill Marler, president of WSU's board of regents. ''I didn't sign on to watch us dilute education to the point where it doesn't mean anything."

    Marler said it's time for state lawmakers to step in, raise taxes and use the money to preserve higher education. Well-educated citizens are critical to the state's economic future, he said.

    WSU Board of Regents reappoints Marler

    I've been reappointed to a second term with the Washington State University Board of Regents, which I currently serve as president. I was first appointed to the WSU Board of Regents in 1998. I served as a member of the Pullman City Council while attending WSU, as the youngest and first student ever elected to the office. Looking forward to another six years.

    Fewer students of color at WSU Decline of 13 percent gets attention of officials, who want improvement;

    In its story Fewer students of color at WSU, the Spokesman Review reported today that while enrollment is up at Washington State University, the number of African-American students on campus is down.

    The African-American student population dropped to close to 13 percent this fall. Although the drop accounts for only 67 fewer students than last year, the decline has grabbed the attention of WSU's Board of Regents, for which I've served since 1998. As the Spokesman Review reports:

    Regent Ken Alhadeff, a Seattle-area business leader, said the school needs a pipeline for students of color.

    ``We must look at everything we can do individually and collectively,'' he told fellow board members.


    Regent President Bill Marler, a Seattle lawyer, echoed his concerns. ``I'm interested in seeing what went wrong and why,'' he said.

    WSU's executive director of enrollment services, Janet Danley, isn't wasting any time trying to find ways to get those numbers up. Her plans include moving multicultural recruiters who have worked off-site this year to her own office to work alongside the general student recruiters. She also plants to talk to African-American students already on campus, as well as those who applied and received scholarships but decided not to attend.

    U. Washington president declines pay increases The cash is flowing in Pullman, Wash.

    U. Washington president declines pay increases, America's Intelligence Wire reported today.

    "In the past few years Rawlins has been at WSU, salaries for presidents in similar institutions outside of Washington state have gone up, said William Marler, WSU Board of Regents president."

    Washington State University President V. Lane Rawlins is paid $254,065 annually and is the second-highest-paid president among Washington state public colleges. He has denied salary increases for the past two years, even though salaries for presidents in similar institutions outside of Washington state have gone up.

    "I feel that leadership requires that you share the conditions of all in the organization, and I did not feel it would be appropriate for me to take an increase when most people are not getting them," Rawlins said. "We have made several special increases in the past two years, but I think my effectiveness would be diminished if I accepted an increase while we are making budget reductions."

    The Board of Regents is attempting to keep the president's salary competitive with that of other universities.

    "The university as a whole is grossly underpaid," said Robert Rosenman, chair of the Department of Economics. "It is laudable that Dr. Rawlins has turned down raises when the university staff and faculty are not getting raises."