Header graphic for print
Marler Blog Providing Commentary on Food Poisoning Outbreaks & Litigation

U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack says the Obama administration is working to improve food safety.

U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack vacated Washington DC today to give a speech at the University of Minnesota.  He was interviewed by Minnesota Public Radio following a major New York Times report over the weekend on flaws in the food safety system cited cases in Minnesota. 

Here is the Press Release that went out this afternoon from FSIS in response to the New York Times article:

Statement by Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack Regarding Recent E. Coli Story
October 05, 2009

"The story we learned about over the weekend is unacceptable and tragic. We all know we can and should do more to protect the safety of the American people and the story in this weekend’s paper will continue to spur our efforts to reduce the incidence of E. coli O157:H7. Over the last eight months since President Obama took office, USDA has been aggressive in its efforts to improve food safety, and has been an active partner in establishing and contributing to President Obama’s Food Safety Working Group.

"Protecting public health is the sole mission of the USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service. FSIS has continued to make improvements to reduce the presence of E. coli O157:H7 and the agency is committed to working to reduce the incidence of foodborne illnesses caused by this pathogen.

"Shortly after coming into office, the Administration created a high-level Food Safety Working Group to coordinate food safety policies, focus greater resources on prevention, and improve response to outbreaks. Since doing so, we have taken the following actions:

* Launched an initiative to cut down E. Coli contamination (including in particular contamination from E. Coli O157:H7) and as part of that initiative, stepped-up meat facility inspections involving greater use of sampling to monitor the products going into ground beef.
* Appointed a chief medical officer within USDA’s Food Safety Inspection Service to reaffirm its role as a public health agency.
* Issued draft guidelines for industry to further reduce the risk of O157 contamination.
* Started testing additional components of ground beef, including bench trim, and issuing new instructions to our employees asking that they verify that plants follow sanitary practices in processing beef carcasses.
* Designed the Public Health Information System (PHIS) in response to lessons learned in past outbreaks.

"USDA is also looking at ways to enhance traceback methods and will initiate a rulemaking in the near future to require all grinders, including establishments and retail stores, to keep accurate records of the sources of each lot of ground beef.

"No priority is greater to me than food safety and I am firmly committed to taking the steps necessary to reduce the incidence of foodborne illness and protect the American people from preventable illnesses. We will continue to make improvements to reduce the presence of E. coli O157:H7."

Now, back to his actual words to Minnesota NPR.  If he had called I would have driven him and Mr. Cargill up to Cold Spring, Minnesota to meet the young woman profiled by the New York Times.  Perhaps, they could help change her diapers?  Help her in and out of her wheelchair? Explain that she will never walk again?  Explain to her that she will never have children?  That she will need multiple kidney transplants to live?  Never have a meaningful job?  And, never dance again?

 

/**/

  • cheryl berenson RN, MS-MPH student OHSU

    I agree, “BS” is the totally correct phrase here– no conflicts of interest at the USDA!!
    I really like Vilsack’s two pronged solution to foodborne illness- 1.blame the consumer and 2.better recall efforts
    we all know that government regulation is off limits!!!

  • http://fanaticcook.blogspot.com/ Bix

    I didn’t hear the kind of passion about protecting people from food borne illness that I wanted to hear. He expressed no urgency. Maybe I have too high a bar for that. He is, after all, a politician.
    I’m glad the interviewer brought up the problem of conflict of interest. No matter what he said after that, the listener will have been informed.
    I learned something. Vilsack said he wished the USDA had more recall authority. That stands in contrast to his predecessors who are on record as saying they can operate better without recall authority. I wonder why the change.