here's the evidence:

1. the e. coli strain in the kids was differnt than the e. coli strain in the samples taken at the mcafee farm.

2. the cdfa paid mcafee money money because they wrongfully accused him of causing an outbreak.

3. consumers assume the risk of the food they consume, especially when it comes to raw milk.

4. the kids also ate other foods, i.e. spinach, that was the source of pathogens.

5. how you gonna prove your case marler?

it's attorneys like you that give attorneys a bad name.

WERE YOU PERSONALLY INVOLVED IN THESE CASES? HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT ALL SIX OF THOSE KIDS ATE SPINACH? I READ THAT THE CHILDRENS PFGE PATTERN OF ECOLI DID NOT MATCH THE ONE OF THE SPINACH OUTBREAK. THEIR PATTERNS MATCHED EACH OTHER AND THE ONLY COMMON THING THEY HAD WAS OP MILK.

EVEN THOUGH PEOPLE ASSUME A RISK WHEN THEY CONSUME A PRODUCT, IT DOESNT MEAN THE PRODUCT SHOULD HAVE ECOLI IN IT!

YOUR FIVE POINTS OF EVIDENCE DONT REALLY SAY ANYTHING THAT SHOWS IT WAS SPINACH OR SOMETHING ELSE. SOUNDS LIKE WISHFUL THINKING TO ME.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://johnathonwhitleyda.easyjournal.com

I find it interesting that you like to extract money in settlements before court, rather than risk going to court. I have met and seen Mark McAfee talk in person. He does not seem like a man who backs down. He is no dog that will sit down for you.