<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Marler Blog - Egg Recall by the Numbers - How many chickens does it take to make 380,000,000 Eggs?   - Comments</title>
      <link>http://www.marlerblog.com/</link>
      <description>Food Poisoning Lawyer &amp; Attorney : Bill Marler : Marler Clark</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 04:22:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 04:22:14 -0800</pubDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.32-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Roy Costa</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The other question is why so large a recall. If the traceability system they should have been using was adequate they would have narrowed this down. It cannot conceivably be that all of these egs are contaminated. We hear from FDA that 1/20,000 eggs are laced with SE. So doing the math 19,000 of these eggs were contaminated-anyway. We have in this case a loci of infection that is yet to be determined therefore these recall numbers do not mean much in terms of risk. Traceability should have narrowed this down to probably a few hundred affected layers.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.marlerblog.com/legal-cases/egg-recall-by-the-numbers---how-many-chickens-does-it-take-to-make-380000000-eggs/#9867</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marlerblog.com/legal-cases/egg-recall-by-the-numbers---how-many-chickens-does-it-take-to-make-380000000-eggs/#9867</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.marlerblog.com/">Legal Cases</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:52:40 -0800</pubDate>
         <author>bmarler@marlerclark.com (Bill Marler)</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Reb</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Several things - 1 out of 20,000 eggs MIGHT be infected from AN INFECTED FLOCK, not in general from all flocks as you have been lead to believe.  So there would not have been 19,000 eggs out in distribution to make people sick anyway if they had come from a non-infected flock.  Remember, too that out of those 19,000 eggs that might be tainted, you would have to eat one that has not been properly cooked as salmonella is killed by reaching cooking temps of 165 degrees, whites are fully firm and yolks are solid, but still soft.  Yes, all the eggs that have been recalled are not tainted, but there are still a goodly amount to worry about.  </p>

<p>Traceability was likely working not too badly, they just kept finding eggs that lead to other ranches and therefore had to keep recalling.  As far as it only affecting a few hundred layers would depend upon biosecurity between their ranches (workers getting it on shoes and taking it to another ranch and spreading it, a poor sanitary practice).  If the FDA saw this practice, they likely included more ranches as a precaution until the flocks can be fully tested and environmental swabs taken to see where all the bad bugs are hiding.  </p>

<p>Also, most commercial hens do lay an egg daily because they have their "daylight" artificially adjusted to promote more frequent laying than a bird does naturally.  </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.marlerblog.com/legal-cases/egg-recall-by-the-numbers---how-many-chickens-does-it-take-to-make-380000000-eggs/#9868</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marlerblog.com/legal-cases/egg-recall-by-the-numbers---how-many-chickens-does-it-take-to-make-380000000-eggs/#9868</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.marlerblog.com/">Legal Cases</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:52:40 -0800</pubDate>
         <author>bmarler@marlerclark.com (Bill Marler)</author>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
