Update: E. coli Outbreak in Fresno County

The Fresno County Health Department said there are now eleven confirmed cases of E. coli in Fresno County. On Thursday, May 31st, investigators are still looking for the source of the bacteria.  The Health Department has inspected the “Meat Market” in Northwest Fresno. Meat from the company may have been served at several private parties where some guests later became sick.  On Tuesday May 29th, five people were confirmed to have the potentially deadly bacteria. Three more cases were confirmed on Wednesday and another three on Thursday. All of the victims had attended one of three private parties that were all serviced by the same caterer.
Related Posts

CDC Reports on Peanut Butter Salmonella

The CDC's publication, Moribidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) released today includes a summary of the ConAgra peanut butter Salmonella outbreak investigation. The report states in part:
In February 2007, a case-control study with 65 patients and 124 controls was conducted to identify the food item associated with illness; the majority of interviews were completed by state and local health departments and were coordinated by CDC. For the study, a case was defined as infection with the outbreak strain of Salmonella Tennessee in a person aged >18 years with a history of diarrhea. Controls were well adults from the patient's community who were matched by geographic location. Controls were identified using a reverse online telephone directory that when given an address provided telephone numbers for residences in the same extended neighborhood as the patients. The median ages for the patients and controls were 53 and 58 years, respectively. Patients were more likely than controls to have eaten peanut butter (81% versus 65%, matched odds ratio [mOR] = 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.8--5.2), to have eaten peanut butter more than once a week (66% versus 40%, mOR = 3.5, CI = 1.4--9.9), and to have eaten either Peter Pan or Great Value peanut butter (67% versus 13%, mOR = 10.9, CI = 3.8--43.0). Neither the consumption of other peanut butter brands nor consumption of turkey products was associated with illness.

Epidemiologic data suggesting Peter Pan brands of peanut butter as the possible source of the outbreak were provided to FDA officials on February 13, 2007. The following day, FDA issued a health alert to consumers indicating that they should not eat Peter Pan or Great Value peanut butter with a product code beginning with 2111, both of which were manufactured in a single facility in Georgia operated by ConAgra Foods. ConAgra Foods voluntarily recalled the products, destroyed existing products in their possession, and temporarily halted production pending further investigation.
We are continuing our own investigation into nearly 5,000 claims of illness after eating the peanut butter. 
Related Posts

E. coli Outbreak in Fresno Share Common Meat Market

Dale Yurong of KFSN Action News first told this story Monday night.  Now it appears that there is a common link between three groups of illnesses.  See full story - excerpt below:

Leann Beck was one of six people admitted to the hospital to be treated for E. coli. She says she got sick days after a Clovis West graduation party where she had tri-tip. (Tri-tips are often mechanically tenderized which may push contamination on the surface of the meat into the interior, thereby making in far more difficult to kill).

The Fresno County Health Department says 20 cases have been reported. Dr. Ed Moreno, Fresno County Public Health Director, says, "There are actually several cases that are under investigation by public health staff. In particular, we have three private events that have come to our attention." Each occurred May 19th. "Among these three events, there was one common supplier of food, " says Dr. Moreno. He continues, "There was also a wedding and another graduation party and everybody narrowed it down to the meat. Everybody was picking up their meat at the same time, at the Meat Market."

See video from Channel 47 too.

Related Posts

Fresno County officials investigate E. coli cases

According to the Fresno Bee, Fresno County health investigators are looking for the food source of an E. coli outbreak that has sickened at least six people who attended private parties in the past two weeks. Five of the six who became ill ate food at the same party on May 19, said Fresno County Health Officer Ed Moreno.  But health workers are talking to people in attendance at two other parties held on the same day to determine if more people have become ill, Moreno said.  A number of food sources are under scrutiny, but the parties were catered by the same company, said Tim Casagrande, the county's director of environmental health.
Related Posts

Getting too serious about food safety?

China food boss sentenced to death

The former head of China's food and drug safety regulatory body has been sentenced to death for corruption. Zheng Xiaoyu was convicted by a court in Beijing on charges of taking bribes and dereliction of duty, the official Xinhua news agency reported on Tuesday. On the same day officials have announced a series of measures for recalling unsafe food products. The news comes as China's leaders grapple with the fallout from a string of health alerts over toxins in food and other products.

I wonder if the CEO's of companies who poison and kill thier customers here in the United Sates are thanking their lucky stars that their parents were not born in China.
Related Posts

ConAgra Salmonella Tennessee Case Count Continues to Grow

As you may remember, the FDA and Con Agra made the original Peanut Butter recall announcement on February 14, 2007. Now the “official” CDC culture-confirmed (through urine, stool or blood) Salmonella Tennessee cases are 481 related to Peter Pan and Great Value. The dates of onset of illness according to the below chart is August 1, 2006 to May 22, 2007. The “official” Peanut Butter case count (all Salmonella Tennessee positives) amount to 629.

The 629 number may be all Salmonella Tennessee positives on record at the CDC in a period (perhaps the October 2004 to February 2007 recall period), or be Salmonella Tennessee positives not yet Epidemiologically linked to the Peanut Butter outbreak. The CDC estimates that for every 1 culture-positive case there are 38.6 times more actual cases. Using the CDC numbers, it is estimated that between 18,500 and 24,275 cases of Salmonella Tennessee are related to the ConAgra outbreak.  I expect that the CDC will publish the above chart and confirm the outbreak numbers in the next week.

I wrote about the increasing numbers in a blog post on April 12, 2007:

ConAgra Salmonella Tennessee Cases Grow

I have learned that the current Salmonella Tennessee case stool and urine positives (substantial numbers of ill people had urinary tract infections instead of stool cultures) have raised to 563 in 47 States. The first reported case is in August 2006 and remaining constant, but low, through September, spiking in October, November, December and then starting to trend down in January and February 2007. There does not appear to be a significant number of matched Salmonella Tennessee cases pre-August 2006 (ten in August and thirteen January to July 2006 and thirty cases in 2005) that are EPI-linked to Peanut Butter despite the recall date being extended to October 2004 (I am not aware of many matched Salmonella Tennessee cases in 2004, although there may well be a few).
I also posted about this outbreak generally on March 10, 2007:

Lawyers, Lawsuits and Statistics in the Peanut Butter Wars

The CDC reported in a statement March 7, 2007, that 425 people in 44 states had been infected with the strain of Salmonella Tennessee also found in Peter Pan and Great Value peanut butter products, and that 71 people had been hospitalized and no deaths. FDA investigators in the Con Agra plant also found that same Salmonella strain, but where it was located has not been announced. Two-thirds of the reported 425 cases began after December 1, 2006.
Putting this in context, the CDC estimates that 76 million foodborne illness, or food poisoning, cases occur in the United States every year (6.3 million per month), which means that one in four Americans contracts a foodborne illness annually after eating foods contaminated with such pathogens as E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella, Hepatitis A, Campylobacter, Shigella, Norovirus, and Listeria. Approximately 325,000 people are hospitalized with a diagnosis of food poisoning, and 5,000 die.
The CDC also reports that 40,000 cases of Salmonella are confirmed yearly in the U.S. As only about 3% of Salmonella cases are officially confirmed nationwide, and many milder cases are never diagnosed, the true incidence is undoubtedly much higher (approximately 1.4 million per year or 110,000 per month). It is estimated that 1,000 deaths are caused by Salmonella infections in the U.S. every year.
Related Posts

California warns that Salad Cosmo sprouts may have salmonella


State health officials warned Thursday that alfalfa sprouts sold by a Northern California company to stores and restaurants in California, Nevada, Oregon and Washington may be contaminated with salmonella bacteria. The company, Salad Cosmo USA Corp., of Dixon, announced a voluntary recall after routine tests found salmonella in alfalfa seeds. "Consumers, especially infants, young children and the elderly, are susceptible to serious infection when exposed to salmonella," said Kevin Reilly, acting state public health officer. The Department of Health Services said Salad Cosmo was recalling two-and-a-half-ounce plastic containers and one-pound plastic bags of sprouts labeled Salad Cosmo Alfalfa Sprouts with the production codes of 0519 to 0526.

I have been advocating warnings since at least 2000 and better techniques to prevent contamination since 2003. I found the Mission Statement of Salad Cosmo Corporation interesting”
Salad Cosmo currently collaborates with professionals from all over the world to constantly improve the quality of our products and make sure that our bacterial testing is utilizing the highest technologies available.

If there ever was a question regarding the quality of our sprouts, our extensive record keeping system enables us to quickly trace each bag of product through the production and growing phases at our facility all the way to the store of purchase.
Related Posts

This is not real, but possible

Related Posts

Career Day

Hi, this is Remy Morritt. I have to keep saying to myself, “Don’t look down!” I am here at MarlerClark law office. Today is career day at my school, Assumption St. Bridget, and I decided I would like to see what a lawyers life would be like. Luckily, Bill Marler is a friend of my dad, and he kindly let me come to his office and bug him. Right now I am sitting 66 floors up, (even higher than the Space Needle!) typing up a passage for Bill’s blog.

I want to be a drummer in a band when I grow up, but I decided to talk to Bill because I want to become a lawyer more. I was thinking of doing damage or crime cases if I become a lawyer, but I like the idea of food poisoning like e.coli and salmonella. I am fascinated on what they are doing now, cases of poisoning from peanut butter. Apparently the peanut butter was in a packet (nasty).

I’m glad I’m doing Bill because my dad knows him, so I feel more comfortable. I also heard that he was the first to come to our house when I was born.  I also love the office, especially the view and the really nice people who work there. The pictures of all the newspaper articles interest me, seeing that there are thousands of cases of e.coli, salmonella, and other poisons. I think if I ever become a lawyer, I will be interested in food poisoning, and it will be all thanks to MarlerClark.

Related Posts

Foodborne Illnesses On The Rise

I was wondering why 2006 and 2007 have been the busiest years at Marler Clark.



The Centers For Disease Control and Prevention have stated that the rate of some foodborne illnesses such as E. coli and salmonella in the United States are on the rise.  A new report released by the United States government finds that the amounts of food born illnesses such as E. coli and salmonella are on the rise.  The report states that although it appears that e. coli and salmonella cases are on the rise, that other food born illnesses have leveled off when it comes to their infection prevalence rate.  Listeria, Shigella, Campylobacter, and Yersinia are all food born bacterial infections that according to data gathered from 10 states have fallen in prevalence since the 90's.

Unfortunately it appears that rates of e. coli and salmonella have risen significantly, a fact that troubles health officials with the Centers For Disease Control and Prevention.


"As recent outbreaks have shown, too many people in the United States are getting sick each year from foodborne illnesses," CDC Director Dr. Julie Gerberding told reporters in a telephone briefing.  "For instance, the outbreaks involving tomatoes, lettuce and spinach underscore the need to more effectively prevent contamination of produce," Gerberding added. "We're also working to strengthen our ability to quickly detect and identify foodborne illnesses. We know the faster we can detect an outbreak, the faster we can take actions that will help protect people."

In the year of 2006, the CDC identified over 17252 cases of food poisoning in the United States. They included 6,655 cases of Salmonella, 590 cases of E. coli O157, an additional 290 cases of other disease-causing strains of E. coli, 138 cases of Listeria and 41 cases of Cyclospora.
Related Posts

Dole, I hope you are paying attention


Todd Blackinton of KPVI Channel 6 of Pocatello reported on the grief of the Allgood family in - Closure: Family Heals After Son Dies From Spinach

As a father of three, I cannot imagine the grief of losing a child.

Jeff Allgood, Kyle's Father: "it's a roller coaster. Every day is a little different." Day by day is how the Allgoods live their lives nine months after the sudden death of their little boy, Kyle. They keep busy, but in those down times, the pain comes back. Robyn Allgood, Kyle's Mother: "There's nights when you just want your son back. You don't want to hear those comforting things and sometimes you have to allow yourself to grieve and to feel that pain. But you do have to allow peace."


I hope the president of DOLE reads this.

Related Posts

The Science and Law of Tracking Foodborne Illness - Part 10 - Conclusion

Looking to the Future

Following Taylor’s example, notice must be served to producers and other food processors that E. coli, Salmonella, and other foodborne pathogens will be classified and treated as adulterants. In addition, the same kind of comprehensive Risk Management System should be established and implemented, along with criminal and civil penalties for violations.

If these best practices were adopted, firms would have to certify that they are in compliance in every aspect of their supply chain. Branding can and should reflect this certification of both the firms and their suppliers. The result would be a “seal of approval,” which should also apply to such issues as the location of produce fields near livestock, what kinds of procedures are employed and the method of irrigation, as well as the type of water used to irrigate.

Second, government needs a food-safety champion like Michael Taylor, an articulate and highly visible spokesperson for food safety. At the same time, we should consolidate responsibility for food safety into one federal-level agency, which would become the authority on best practices, and the point of contact for state and local regulators and health departments.

Third, the food industry itself needs to take more responsibility for quickly and efficiently warning consumers as soon as it is discovered that contaminated food has entered the marketplace. The recent peanut butter scandal in the U.S. is a classic example of the costs of failing to do this. Federal and state governments should assert their authority in this area – especially at the state or regional level, since most outbreaks are regional, not national.

Fourth, we need to develop an E. coli vaccine for cows. The majority of outbreaks linked to fresh vegetables are caused by contamination by cow manure from adjacent or nearby fields.

Fifth, we need to educate the public about the benefits of irradiation of all mass-produced food, including fresh produce. Resistance to this practice seems to be rooted in perception, not science.

Sixth, attention must be paid to the vulnerability of food-supply systems to acts of terrorism. Denial and lack of common sense seem to dominate thinking at all levels – business and federal and state governments.

Seventh, government must use its economic and political leverage to monitor food imports and enforce the same standards enforced on domestic producers. This is a central trade issue that has been neglected.

And finally, there is an urgent need to improve the resources available to victims of foodborne illness. In the US, where the system relies on private medical insurance, out-of-pocket medical costs are rarely reimbursed by insurance – even if victims have coverage. By the time compensation arrives, victims can be mired in debt. And food processors and retailers whose products sicken their customers should minimally provide, as a gesture of goodwill, reimbursement for lost wages. This is not just the ethical response. It’s also good business practice.

Taken together, all of these recommendations will go a long way toward improving the safety and security of our food supply. In the U.S., one of the major food-safety success stories came as a result of the 1993 Jack in the Box outbreak. According to the CDC, E. coli outbreaks linked to tainted meat have declined by 42 percent. The American Meat Institute puts that figure at 80 percent.

Now consumer confidence in fresh produce has been shaken. Because three-quarters of America’s lettuce and spinach comes from California, the problem has hurt an industry, undermining consumer confidence not just in one supplier, but also in an entire sector, most of which continues to produce a healthy and safe product. More companies, ranging from food processors to retailers, are asking for help to regain their “reputational capital” after foodborne disease problems. It remains to be seen whether the brand names of the fast-food chains involved in the recent E. coli or Salmonella outbreaks will fully recover.

Obviously, the goal of the food-service industry should be to produce high quality products that sell well without injuring customers. With this goal in mind, everyone’s interests are better served by the fair and efficient assessments of claims, by health and food-industry officials alike, rather than by the extreme reaction so often seen.

To that end, any business that produces food should be prepared to respond quickly and wisely to any claim of illness caused by its product. There is a natural tendency to react out of anger, but combative responses almost invariably backfire on the industry. Certainly, if a claim of harm is truly bogus, the industry can and should fight it. But when a claim has merit, it is better to treat a customer fairly and learn from mistakes. A calm and reasoned perspective will help the food industry keep its eye on the bottom line.
Related Posts

The Science and Law of Tracking Foodborne Illness - Part 9

Learning From the Past

So how can we ensure that the gains in food safety already made are preserved and the new problems addressed? Based on my many years of experience with the issues, here are some recommendations:

It took a nationwide crisis, and the horrible deaths of several young children, for the US to begin addressing the issue of E. coli contamination in meat. That crisis occurred in the early 1990s, when undercooked hamburgers containing the deadly strain of bacteria E. coli O157:H7 sold by a U.S. fast-food restaurant chain, Jack in the Box, sickened 650 people and four children died.

After the Jack in the Box tragedy, the head of the USDA’s Food and Safety Inspection Service, Michael Taylor, took a regulatory and systems approach to food safety. Taylor declared that E. coli-contaminated raw ground beef would be classified and treated as “adulterated” within the meaning of the Federal Meat Inspection Act. Taylor also introduced a mandatory Risk Management System that required meat processors to adopt comprehensive precautions that included carcass washes, citric acid sprays, steam pasteurization, and air-exchange systems.

This appears to have worked. Incidents of E. coli poisoning involving ground beef have declined. And there is a lesson here for the broader food industry.
Related Posts

Peter Pan vs Captain Hook - again


I'm not sure exactly why I posted this picture - I see Peter going for the chest of gold.  Both he and Captain Hook are balanced on my window ledge on the 66th floor looking out on the bay on another rainy, Seattle day.  Somewhat sums up my day talking and emailing to lawyers on both sides of the Peter Pan Peanut Butter Salmonella Outbreak.
Related Posts

The Science and Law of Tracking Foodborne Illness - Part 8

Case Study: Salmonella poisoning

In 2003, an Illinois health department received multiple reports that people had become ill after eating at Chili’s Grill & Bar in Vernon Hills, Illinois. Investigators visited the restaurant, and soon learned that its dishwashing machine was broken and corroded; the tube that fed chlorine into the machine was plugged, preventing proper sanitization of dishes. They also found that food was not stored at proper temperatures, and those three employees, plus another manager, had called in sick that day. With evidence growing increasingly clear, investigators instructed employees on hand-washing procedures, and collected stool samples from the employees. They discovered 13 employees who had been allowed to work despite suffering from diarrhea and other symptoms. Under pressure, Chili’s closed the restaurant.

But the problem was only beginning to emerge. People who had eaten at the restaurant recently were instructed to seek medical help if ill, and to report their illnesses to the health department. The health department was flooded with telephone complaints. One customer reported there had been no running water while she had been there for lunch – information that management had not thought necessary to share with investigators.

Eventually, investigators identified over 300 individuals who had been sickened as a result of the outbreak. Of those, 141 customers and 28 employees tested positive for Salmonella, while 105 others were deemed probable cases. The health department concluded that infected employees had contaminated food with Salmonella as a result of poor sanitary practices and improper food handling.

Clearly, this entire outbreak could have been avoided by the most simple and obvious of sanitary practices. The company’s shortcuts turned out to be extremely costly
Related Posts

Some Of My Upcoming Food Safety Speeches

12.05.2007 - Almond Board of California

Bill Marler will present at the California Almond Board's 35th Annual Almond Industry Conference in Modesto, California.

11.06.2007 - Food HACCP


Bill Marler will travel to San Francisco for the 2nd International Food HACCP conference. He will present on foodborne illness litigation and strict liability. In addition, Marler Clark is a conference sponsor.

09.20.2007 - Washington Association for Food Protection


Marler Clark managing partner Bill Marler will travel to Chelan, Washington, to present at the Washington Association for Food Protection's annual conference. His speech will focus on how companies can make food safety a priority.

08.29.2007 - Dairy Industry Association of Australia

Bill Marler will travel to Melbourne, Australia, to be the keynote speaker at the Dairy Association of Australia's Dairy Science World Series conference. He will be the lead speaker in a session titled, "Dairy Food Safety - Challenges and Impacts," for a conference themed, "Turning Barriers into Benefits - the Science behind Dairy Regulation."

08.02.2007 - Australian HACCP Conference Series

Bill Marler will present at the 14th Australian HACCP Conference in Gold Coast, Australia. His presentation will be given during a program titled, "Tell us about class actions relating to foodborne illness in USA.

06.19.2007 - National Environmental Health Association

Denis Stearns and Bill Marler will speak during the Handwashing Leadership Forum session at the National Environmental Health Association conference in Atlantic City, New Jersey. Denis and Bill will participate in a mock trial related to a foodborne illness outbreak that was the result of poor hand hygiene.
Related Posts

Salmonella outbreak In Racine, Wisconsin reaches 20 cases


Brent Killackey of the Racine Journal Times wrote on Friday:
The Caledonia/Mount Pleasant Health Department and the Racine Health Department are investigating a salmonella outbreak that, as of Wednesday, had reached 20 laboratory-confirmed cases.  Sixteen of those cases were in Racine County, including eight in the city of Racine, according to health department officials. Health officials were investigating two cases in Waushara County, one in Milwaukee County and one in Kenosha County that may be linked to the Racine County cases.
It will be interesting to see if a source is found.  For more information on Salmonella, visit www.about-salmonella.com.

Related Posts

I hope I was right about the meat industry.

A few months ago, I wrote and Oped piece praising the meat industry from lowering the number of E. coli O157:H7 illnesses.  As I wrote: "[a]s a lawyer specializing in food-borne illness litigation, I’ve seen this happen [reduction in E. coli O157:H7 cases tied to meat], but I’m still as busy as ever. A decade ago most of my clients had been sickened by tainted meat. In fact, between 1993 and 2002 I took over $250 Million from the meat industry in verdicts and settlements on behalf of my clients, mostly children with kidney failure caused from consuming E. coli-tainted hamburger. Today, my business comes almost entirely from people sickened by lettuce, sprouts, tomatoes, spinach, green onions, and parsley."  (See my youtube video).

I hope these recent E. coli-related outbreaks tied to meat are an aberration.  So, far we have been contacted by the families of several victims from both outbreaks below:

Davis Creek Meats of Michigan issued a beef recall in the last week because of E. coli O157:H7 contamination. The recall is for 129,000 pounds of beef products produced between March 1st and April 30th, and includes the states of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Missouri, Wisconsin, Arkansas, Florida, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia. The affected meat comes in boxes with the number “Est. 1947A.”

Lund’s and Byerly’s of Minnesota issued a ground beef recall last week prompted by the sickness of at least seven people who ate ground beef produced by PM Beef Holdings and sold at Lunds and Byerly’s stores in several states including Illinois, Iowa, Wisconsin, Arizona, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio and Virginia. PM Beef, the meat company responsible for supplying tainted trim, withdrew nearly 117,500 pounds of beef it had shipped to eight states. The beef trim was turned into ground beef by the stores that sold them under many different retail brand names.

Related Posts

The Science and Law of Tracking Foodborne Illness - Part 7

Case Study: Ammonia poisoning

The majority of foodborne illnesses arise from avoidable errors—often an accumulation of many errors. In a 2002 case, school children and teachers at an Illinois public school consumed chicken contaminated with ammonia – a poisoning that resulted from the acts and omissions of three separate entities.

In 2001, the State of Illinois contracted with Tyson, a major food company, for processed chicken for school lunches. The chicken was processed at a plant in Pennsylvania. Lanter Refrigeration stored it. But Tyson’s delivery greatly exceeded Lanter’s shipping and storage capacity, so Lanter contracted with Gateway Cold Storage to house the overflow chicken products at its facility in Missouri. The chicken was stored along with large amounts of other food intended for consumption at Illinois schools.

In November, 2001, there was a large ammonia leak at the Missouri storage facility, and massive amounts of food destined for the school lunch program, including the chicken, were exposed to ammonia. Neither gateway nor Lanter notified health authorities or the Illinois State Board of Education. Even more remarkably, Gateway and Lanter continued shipping food from the facility, shipping some 800,000 pounds of product after the leak without any notice to customers. Originally, it was a shipment of potato wedges to Illinois schools that first alerted authorities. Schools began complaining of potatoes that smelled of ammonia, prompting an inquiry, and the companies admitted that a leak had occurred. The state instructed Lanter to place all food connected with the school lunches on hold, pending further evaluation.

The FDA at this time “determined to place all product stored at Gateway at time of ammonia leak on hold until procedures are established for clean up and treatment of products to dissipate ammonia odor.” But the companies decided that, rather than destroy the food and take the loss, they would re-box, re-label, and “re-condition” the boxes, and then send them on to the schools. Apparently the chicken was reconditioned to remove the smell, but nothing was done to actually remove any ammonia. Eventually, the chicken was served to students at the Illinois elementary school. Within minutes, 157 students, roughly half the school, fell ill. The scene verged on total chaos. Students and teachers were running into the halls vomiting, with their throats and noses burning. Students panicked. School administrators called in ambulances, and children were taken to five local hospitals.

Who was at fault? Virtually every entity involved - and, there were criminal charges.
Related Posts

Report: Answers Limited In Food Contamination Outbreak Investigations


Megan Shannon of All Headline News reported on the recent E. coli outbreaks:
Last year's string of outbreaks of E. coli bacteria in the U.S. food supply have left many questions in the minds of Americans. But limited resources and other food contamination outbreaks left the Food and Drug Administration with no real answers.  In 2006, E. coli-contaminated lettuce served at a Taco John's restaurant sickened 81 people in Minnesota. Around that time, there were also outbreaks in spinach, then later peanut butter. The most recent outbreak was in a large portion of the nation's pet food supply.

In most cases, officials from the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention have confirmed where the culprit food originated.  For instance, an investigation found that the tainted Taco John's lettuce most likely came from a farm in Central California. But the agencies have yet to unearth how these foods became contaminated and what can be done to prevent further contaminations.

Some have criticized the way these agencies handled the cases but officials said they are simply doing what they can with what they have.  One attorney, who has worked several contamination lawsuits involving the lettuce contamination, said investigations are typically slow. Bill Marler, a Seattle, Washington, attorney specializing in food-poisoning cases, said he has yet to get results from a 2005 Dole lettuce outbreak.

He told CNN, "You'd think that after so many outbreaks, the government and the leafy green industry would do something about this."
Related Posts

Timeline: Deaths and Illnesses Caused by Food Contamination



Jennifer O'Shea of US News and World Report set forth a "Timeline" of deaths and illnesses caused by food poisonings.  The problem is that the list if very, very incomplete.  She should have visited www.marlerclark.com or www.billmarler.com for the most complete list of food poisoning outbreaks from 1993 to the present.  Her list is as follows:

2007  August 2006–February 2007: Salmonella-tainted peanut butter from the Peter Pan and Great Value brands sickened hundreds of people in 44 states. The CDC is still investigating how a Georgia manufacturing plant was contaminated.

2006  November–December: 71 people became sick with E. coli after eating at Taco Bell restaurants in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Delaware. The fast-food chain initially blamed its green onion supply, though investigations by the CDC later suggested that lettuce was the source of the problem.

September–October: Prewashed, bagged spinach from Dole was contaminated with E. coli. At least 205 consumers fell ill; three died. Investigators traced the strain back to the field in California and said that in this instance, washing could not have removed the bacteria.

2002  Fall: Pilgrim's Pride recalled over 27 million pounds of frozen and prepared poultry products after listeria was found at one of its Pennsylvania processing plants. Eight people died, and 50 became seriously ill in the ensuing outbreak.

1998  The Malt-o-Meal cereal company recalled approximately 3 million pounds of its Toasty-O's cereal after the product was found to contain salmonella. Nearly 200 people, many of them children, got sick. According to the CDC, this was the first time a manufactured cereal was linked to salmonella transmission.

Hot dogs and lunch meats from Sara Lee became tainted with listeria following mechanical work at the manufacturing plant. At least 15 died, and six miscarriages were attributed to the outbreak. Eighty customers also became seriously ill.

1997  August: After 17 people in Colorado contracted E. coli from eating hamburgers, supplier Hudson Foods recalled 25 million pounds of frozen patties. At the time, this was the largest meat recall in U.S. history.

Spring: The CDC noticed something unusual: Hundreds of Michigan children and schoolteachers were diagnosed with hepatitis A. Investigators discovered that a contaminated shipment of strawberries had been imported the previous year and mislabeled as domestic. The strawberries were used in frozen desserts and served with school lunches. Ultimately, over 9,000 students were vaccinated.

1996  Shipments of Guatemalan raspberries were contaminated with the intestinal parasite cyclospora. An estimated 1,500 in the U.S. and Canada became infected before the cause was found. Investigators blamed the problem on unhygienic growing conditions. In response, the U.S. halted importation of the Guatemalan fruit. The ban was partially lifted in 1999.

1993  January: Four children died and at least 700 became ill after eating hamburgers from Washington state Jack in the Box fast-food restaurants. The meat was tainted with E. coli, and the burgers had not been cooked to a high-enough temperature to kill the bacteria. The scale of the outbreak brought national attention to the issue of food safety and prompted the development of PulseNet, a program that links data from the CDC and state health departments.
Related Posts

The Science and Law of Tracking Foodborne Illness - Part 6

Laboratory testing, PFGE, and epidemiologic investigations

Health care providers may in some instances order testing of an ill person’s blood or stool to help determine the cause of illness. In many circumstances a positive result in such a test must be reported to the health authorities pursuant to statute or regulation. Many states require reporting of positive tests for a number of pathogens, including E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella, Shigella, Listeria, hepatitis A, Campylobacter, and others. It is the report of such positive results that often triggers health department investigations of outbreaks.

Perhaps the most important scientific advance in tracing food poisoning is in pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), or DNA “fingerprinting.”
When a sample of bacteria, such as E. coli or Salmonella, is taken from a stool sample or a meat product, it can be cultured to obtain and identify the bacterial isolate. Bacterial isolates can be further broken down into their various component parts, creating a DNA “fingerprint.” PFGE operates by causing alternating electric fields to run the DNA through a flat gel matrix of agarose, a polysaccharide obtained from agar. The pattern of bands of the DNA fragments – or “fingerprints”- in the gel after the exposure to the electrical current is unique for each strain and sub-type of bacteria. By performing this procedure, scientists can identify hundreds of strains of E. coli as well as other pathogenic bacteria. The pattern of bacteria isolated from contaminated food can be compared and matched to the PFGE pattern isolated from infected persons.

When PFGE patterns match, they, along with solid epidemiological work, provide reliable evidence that the contaminated product was the likely source of the person’s illness. This is particularly true where the PFGE pattern has not been reported elsewhere. For example, suppose two unrelated persons both test positive for a genetically identical, unique strain of E. coli O157:H7 in a given town within a matter of days. If the subsequent inquiry into these two illnesses reveals no other common exposures between the two people other than a hamburger from the same restaurant on the same day, it is nearly impossible to find a credible, alternate explanation for their illnesses.

In 1993, a large E. coli outbreak occurred in the western United States. Scientists at the CDC performed DNA "fingerprinting" by PFGE and determined that the strain of E. coli O157:H7 found in patients had the same pattern as the strain isolated from hamburger patties served at a large chain of regional fast food restaurants. Had this source been identified sooner, it might have prevented hundreds of illnesses. As a result, the CDC developed standardized PFGE methods and, in collaboration with the Association of Public Health Laboratories, created PulseNet so that scientists at public health laboratories throughout the country can rapidly compare the PFGE patterns of bacteria isolated from ill persons and determine whether they are similar, thus indicating an outbreak linked to exposure to a common source of bacteria. PulseNet is an early warning system for outbreaks of foodborne disease, a national network of public health laboratories that performs DNA “fingerprinting” on bacteria that may be foodborne. The network identifies and labels each pattern and permits rapid comparison of these patterns through an electronic database at the CDC to identify related strains. At present, PulseNet tracks four foodborne disease-causing bacteria: Campylobacter jejuni, E. coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, nontyphoidal Salmonella, Shigella, and Yersinia pestis.

With an isolated illness, the lack of a positive stool culture may be problematic for a claimant. In the context of most outbreaks, however, circumstantial evidence may compensate. One such example is where one member of a dining party does not get tested, and others do. If three of four persons who ate together fall ill with the same documented pathogen, and the fourth demonstrates the same symptoms in the same time frame, liability can easily be established without the positive stool culture. In addition, in food poisoning cases there frequently is no food to test because, not surprisingly, it was eaten or discarded. But if leftover food, or uncooked portions, tests positive for the given bacteria or virus, we have powerful evidence that the food is the likely cause of the illness.
Related Posts

Why I love my work

A few weeks ago I turned 50 and in a few months I will have been a lawyer for 20 years.  For those who know me to be "on" 24/7, and always a cell phone or a email away, it should come as no surprise that I actually love my work.  By all measures my legal life has been rewarding, but my obsession with my work,  certainly has impacted my family, including daughters, ages, 15, 12 and 8.  Hopefully, this letter that I received from the family of a child whose case we settled a few weeks ago for $7,000,000 (I changed the child's name), will at least give my kids some understanding of why I do what I do:
Dear Marler Clark and all associates,

I would like to personally thank you for the hard work, dedication, perseverance, sacrifice, love and care that you have shown our family over the last 15 months. Your attention to our family during these hard months is and will always be an extraordinary testimony to our lives and the life of Danny. It is rare that a person can speak fondly of their attorney or any attorney for that matter, and we find ourselves always praising the Marler and Clark team for not only what you have done for our family, but for the awesome people you have working for the firm. A time when our family seemed to be ripping at the seams, we always knew that you were there for us on a level that can never be understood by anyone, but us. A listening ear, a voice of concern, a sincere of heart conversation and many other awesome qualities from your team will always be remembered in our hearts.

Although Danny will never remember these events, we will always be sure to tell him about an amazing team of lawyers and staff from Seattle, Washington who forever changed his life and the dynamics of our family. You will be remembered as the people who gave Danny a voice, when he could not speak for himself, who helped to give him the opportunities that he now has for his life, and who gave hope to a family in their time of trials and tribulation.

We never felt as if we were just any other “clients”, but you made us feel special and that has made all the difference. We truly feel in our souls that God sent you to us not by chance but that is has been an ordained meeting. You and your families will always be in our hearts and prayers. We sill always call you our friends. Thank you again and again.

Sincerely,

Danny’s Family

Related Posts

Still no answers in Taco John's 2006 lettuce E. coli outbreak



CNN reporter Stephanie Smith and I talked last week, or I talked and she listened about last years E. coli O157:H7 outbreak tied to lettuce at Taco John's restaurants in Minnesota and Iowa.  A fe other interesting facts:

• E. coli on lettuce at Taco John's restaurants sickened at least 81 people last year
• Investigation continuing, has not determined how lettuce became contaminated
• FDA: 20 outbreaks of E. coli linked to California lettuce since 1995
  • California produce, it seems, has a problem with E. coli 0157:H7, which is most commonly found in cattle feces. Since 1995 there have been more than 20 outbreaks of E. coli in lettuce and leafy greens traced back to farms in that state.
"You'd think that after so many outbreaks, the government and the leafy green industry would do something about this," said Bill Marler, a Seattle, Washington, attorney specializing in food-poisoning cases.  Marler has been at the helm of several lawsuits against the leafy green industry. He says investigations are traditionally slow, and he still does not have a report from a 2005 outbreak in Dole lettuce.

"Some people are just angry and I think some people feel violated," said Marler. "When you think about it, it's not a really pleasant thought that you're eating someone or something's feces. That's just not a very pleasant concept."


Full article can be found at CNN
Related Posts

E. coli lawsuits against festival are settled

Both cases focused on a petting zoo at the Strawberry Festival.

Dong-Phuong Nguyen of the Times and I spoke yesterday about the settlement and the future of petting zoos - I would urge everyone to see www.fair-safety.com:
A 7-year-old Tampa girl and a 53-year-old St. Petersburg woman who were sickened from an E. coli outbreak at a petting zoo two years ago have settled their lawsuits against the Florida Strawberry Festival.

Bill Marler, a Seattle attorney who specializes in E. coli cases and represented both parties, would not disclose the amount of the confidential settlements. He did say, however, that it fell within the range of typical settlements and jury verdicts for similar cases.

That range, Marler said, is in the millions.

"It's a hard lesson for petting zoos and county fairs to learn," Marler said Thursday, "but they really need to do more than what they have been doing."

Link to Full Story Here.

Tampa Bay Story Here.


The 2005 Florida E. coli outbreak was the 16th documented outbreak traced to animal exposure at a fair or petting zoo since 2000, including a widely publicized E. coli outbreak in North Carolina that occurred just months before. “The Florida Strawberry Festival had plenty of opportunities to become educated about the risks associated with animal exhibits, and petting zoos in particular, but didn’t bother to access the information available and act on existing recommendations to prevent illness among its patrons,” said, co-counsel, Michael Heilmann, noting potential sources of information available before the outbreak:
  • In 2001, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a “Compendium of Measures To Prevent Disease Associated with Animals in Public Settings” in an October Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
  • In 2003, authors of a study on the prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 in livestock at 29 county and 3 large state agricultural fairs in the United States found that E. coli O157:H7 could be isolated from 13.8% of beef cattle, 5.9% of dairy cattle, 3.6% of pigs, 5.2% of sheep, and 2.8% of goats. Over seven percent of pest fly pools also tested positive for E. coli O157:H7 (Keene et al, 2003).
  • In 2004, Marler Clark launched www.fair-safety.com, a Web site designed to inform users of the risks related with human-animal contact in fair and petting zoo settings.
  • Also in 2004, Marler presented on legal liability at the International Association of Fairs and Expositions’ 114th Annual Convention and Trade Show.
Related Posts

The Science and Law of Tracking Foodborne Illness Part 5

Health care provider treatment and diagnosis

Medical records are also an important part of making a food-poisoning case. Both stool cultures, and less commonly blood cultures, can identify the particular pathogen causing a claimant’s illness.

As previously discussed, each foodborne pathogen carries with it an expected incubation period – the amount of time expected to pass between exposure to the pathogen and the onset of symptoms. Medical records can help identify the cause and timing of the exposure.

Symptoms are also important. Most common bacterial and viral pathogens found in food cause similar symptoms -- nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fever, aches, chills, and the like. Various pathogens can have more typical courses. While these cannot be used alone to determine the pathogen affecting a claimant, it can be part of the puzzle. For example, yellow skin and eyes, or jaundice often characterizes hepatitis A infections. E. coli O157:H7 infections are most often characterized by excessively painful stomach cramps and bloody diarrhea.
Related Posts

The Science and Law of Tracking Foodborne Illness - Part 4

Health agency inspections and documentation

One extraordinarily effective tool in establishing the defectiveness of a product that no longer exists is uncovering documentation of the food service establishment’s track record from previous health inspections.  This may include information regarding prior incidents or accusations of food contamination and prior inspections of the facility and the establishment’s food production and service procedures.  Supportive documents can be acquired through the discovery process or through the applicable Freedom of Information Act.  Such documents will help the plaintiff make his case in a variety of ways. Sometimes, there may be documentation of improper food handling procedures that can circumstantially support one’s case.  In other situations, a list of improper techniques and code violations can serve as a tool for limiting a defendant’s trial options, or it can position a case for early and favorable settlement. Finally, particularly egregious or repetitive examples of improper food handling techniques can help build a case for punitive damages,  where such damages are available.

Documentation of improper or inadequate cooking procedures can help make a case for food poisoning.  In 2001, a young girl suffered a particularly severe E. coli O157:H7 infection that left her with permanent kidney damage. She had eaten a hamburger purchased from a California fast-food chain.  By the time health department officials investigated, however, the case of meat from which the girl’s hamburger had been chosen was long gone. The health department did not find any food on site that tested positive for E. coli O157:H7.   But a thorough review of the restaurant’s current and prior inspections revealed a serious flaw in the firm’s cooking method that provided an explanation for the client’s exposure. According to the inspection report:
“Hamburger buns are toasted on the grill immediately adjacent to the cooking patties, and it is conceivable that, early in the cooking process, prior to pasteurization, meat juices and blood containing active pathogens might possibly splash onto a nearby bun.”
In fact, the restaurant had been advised at least six times of the dangers of cross contamination of the buns by hamburger juices. The matter settled shortly after the presentation of this information.

In a 2002 case, a Chinese restaurant in Ohio was the suspected source of an E. coli O157:H7 outbreak. Again, no contaminated leftover food was found. In addition, the restaurant was buffet-style, which complicated the identification of a single contaminated food item. A disproportionate number of ill patrons were children, and it began to appear that the culprit food might in fact be Jell-O. Obtaining the health department investigation report provided the answer to the obvious question:  How would Jell-O become the source of an E. coli outbreak?   A previous inspection report identified a host of food handling errors, including “raw meat stored above the Jell-O in the refrigerator.”  Officials concluded that “the likely source of E. coli O157:H7 in the Jell-O was from raw meat juices dripping on the Jell-O while it was solidifying in the refrigerator.”  Once that report was obtained, the restaurant never seriously contested liability.

Another example:  In 2003, a group of people who had attended a banquet hosted by a restaurant in Washington State fell ill several days later. Many of them tested positive for Salmonella, but leftover food had either been discarded or had tested negative.  Nonetheless, the health department’s subsequent investigation provided the information necessary to establish liability. The restaurant had violated state regulations by “pooling” dozens, if not hundreds, of raw eggs in a single bucket for storage overnight. This process allowed bacterial contamination from a single egg to taint exponentially larger amounts of food, thereby placing many more consumers at risk. The establishment used the raw, pooled, eggs as a “wash” on a specialty dessert. Then, once again in violation of food code, food workers failed to cook the eggs thoroughly.

Improper sanitation is a frequent problem.  In 2000, a producer and distributor of high-end fresh food items were identified as the source of a large Shigella outbreak on the West Coast. The relatively new firm marketed itself as a high-end food business, but health inspections revealed serious problems, including the lack of fully operational bathrooms for employees, insects near food production sites, and evidence of rodents in the facility. We also learned that a major commercial purchaser of the firm’s product had conducted its own inspection, and had refused to purchase any more products until a number of significant upgrades were made to the facility.

In a 2002 case, a Seattle-area restaurant was suspected as the source of a medium-sized outbreak of food poisoning. Even though one of the patrons experienced an unusually severe illness, authorities were unable to pinpoint the particular pathogen. The defendant and its insurer were initially unwilling to concede liability, but previous inspection reports revealed a consistent pattern of poor food handling practices. The repeat occurrences of numerous health code violations led the health department to close the restaurant and temporarily revoke its license. In the end, the restaurant decided not to contest liability.

Documented histories can go a long way toward supporting a claim for punitive damages. In 1996, Odwalla, a well-known California producer of fresh juices, was identified as the source of a major outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 infections on the West Coast. Through the discovery process,  we sought documentation of inspections by governmental agencies, Odwalla itself, and private parties.  After many legal delays, we uncovered previously undisclosed inspection reports, including a report from the United States Department of the Army, revealing that the U.S. Army had inspected Odwalla’s production methods prior to the outbreak and determined not to buy its products. In a letter to Odwalla, Army officials stated:
“We reviewed deficiencies noted in the report, which our inspector discussed with you at the time of the inspection. As a result, we determined that your plant sanitation program does not adequately assure product wholesomeness for military consumers. This lack of assurance prevents approval of your establishment as a source of supply for the Armed Forces at this time.”   
Through further discovery, we obtained internal company emails reacting to the Army’s inspection. One Odwalla employee had suggested a microbiological testing program to address some of the problems uncovered in the inspection. The following is a portion of an email responding to the suggestion:
“…why are we doing it, why now, what do we WANT TO PROVE…IF THE DATA is bad, what do we do about it. Once you create a body of data, it is subpoenable.”
At the time of the E. coli outbreak, the company had not adopted the suggested testing regimen. We filed a motion to apply California law regarding punitive damages due to Odwalla’s prior knowledge that its product was unsafe. With the punitive damages motion pending, we obtained a multi-million dollar settlement for the families of children who sustained permanent kidney damage after developing HUS.
Related Posts

Victims of 2005 E. coli petting zoo outbreak reach settlement with petting zoo operator, Florida Strawberry Festival


Two victims of the 2005 E. coli outbreak traced to a petting zoo at the Florida Strawberry Festival resolved claims brought against the festival last week. Both victims, a woman and a young child, suffered hemolytic uremic syndrome (www.about-hus.com) and required extensive medical treatment, including dialysis, after contracting E. coli O157:H7 at the 2005 Florida Strawberry Festival.
“Our clients and their families are happy to have this litigation behind them,” said William Marler, managing partner of Marler Clark, the Seattle law firm that has successfully represented hundreds of E. coli outbreak victims in similar lawsuits.

The 2005 Florida E. coli outbreak was the 16th documented outbreak traced to animal exposure at a fair or petting zoo since 2000, including a widely publicized E. coli outbreak in North Carolina that occurred just months before. “The Florida Strawberry Festival had plenty of opportunities to become educated about the risks associated with animal exhibits, and petting zoos in particular, but didn’t bother to access the information available and act on existing recommendations to prevent illness among its patrons,” said, co-counsel, Michael Heilmann, noting potential sources of information available before the outbreak:
  • In 2001, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a “Compendium of Measures To Prevent Disease Associated with Animals in Public Settings” in an October Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
  • In 2003, authors of a study on the prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 in livestock at 29 county and 3 large state agricultural fairs in the United States found that E. coli O157:H7 could be isolated from 13.8% of beef cattle, 5.9% of dairy cattle, 3.6% of pigs, 5.2% of sheep, and 2.8% of goats. Over seven percent of pest fly pools also tested positive for E. coli O157:H7 (Keene et al, 2003).
  • In 2004, Marler Clark launched www.fair-safety.com, a Web site designed to inform users of the risks related with human-animal contact in fair and petting zoo settings.
  • Also in 2004, Marler presented on legal liability at the International Association of Fairs and Expositions’ 114th Annual Convention and Trade Show.
BACKGROUND: Marler Clark (www.marlerclark.com) is a law firm dedicated to representing victims of outbreaks of pathogenic bacteria, such as E. coli O157:H7. The firm currently represents over 100 victims of last year’s E. coli outbreaks traced to spinach and lettuce, and nearly 5,000 victims of the recent Salmonella outbreak traced to contaminated peanut butter, and nine victims of the 2004 North Carolina State Fair petting zoo E. coli outbreak.
Related Posts

DANGER - POISONED FOOD - CNN SPECIAL



What you eat can make your sick – May 19th and 20th at 8:00 PM EST


America’s dirty little secret. Do you know what you’re really eating? Dr. Sanjay Gupta uncovers the truth.

Related Posts

Who's Watching What We Eat?

It is great to see the New York Times focusing attention on food safety - especially E. coli O157:H7 - and quite pleased to see that our clients, the Armstrongs, were interviewed:

Elizabeth Armstrong did not give the Food and Drug Administration much thought until her children became ill from eating contaminated bagged spinach.

Her 2-year-old daughter, Ashley, one of more than 200 people affected by the outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 in spinach last year, is still dealing with the effects of kidney failure. Today she is off dialysis and home from the hospital. But she is on daily medication and will eventually need a kidney transplant, said her mother, who lives with her family in a suburb of Indianapolis.  The incident galvanized Ms. Armstrong, turning her into something of a food-safety activist. Testifying before Congress in April, she said that the Food and Drug Administration, the agency responsible for regulating much of the food we eat, including spinach, needed to be reformed.  The agency has known about contamination issues with fresh produce for 10 years, she said in a telephone interview. “They have sent threatening letters to growers and packagers, but they never stepped in and told them they need to change their operations,” she continued.
“You live in the United States of America and this isn’t supposed to happen. There is an assumption that everything is going to be O.K., that someone must have checked this out, but it is not the case.”
Ms. Armstrong is one of many people demanding an overhaul of the agency. The cause gained momentum in the past year as at least three people died and more than a thousand were sickened by contaminated tomatoes, lettuce, peanut butter and spinach. But the recent contamination of pet food, which has killed many animals, seems to have been the last straw.

The Salinas Newspaper is covering this story as well.
Related Posts

The Science and Law of Tracking Foodborne Illness - Part 3

Health agency investigation

Although statutes and regulations vary from state to state, there are a number of bacterial and viral illnesses associated with food consumption that are monitored by health departments, including E. coli O157:H7, Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shigella, Listeria, Norovirus, and hepatitis A. For most of these pathogens, a positive lab result from a human sample (blood or stool), triggers a mandatory report to the local health authority and some type of follow-up investigation. The length, breadth, and paperwork involved in any investigation varies depending on the pathogen involved, the type of food, the number of persons who may be sick, the local jurisdiction, and other factors.

In the litigation of thousands of food poisoning claims arising out of dozens of outbreaks, food producers frequently take issue with some or all of the health department’s conclusions regarding a given outbreak. In our experience, none of these defendants has successfully avoided liability where the health department has linked a specific product to a specific outbreak. One likely reason for this is that most health departments do good and careful work. Despite the occasional disagreement of the pinpointed member of the food service industry, most would agree that health departments are rather cautious and conservative. In our experience, health departments do not lightly or prematurely label an entity as the source of an outbreak.

In addition, health departments operate with a much higher burden of proof than the civil justice system. Most epidemiologists will not confirm an outbreak without 95 percent confidence in a particular conclusion – a much more difficult threshold than a lawyer faces in convincing a jury.

Finally, it has also been our experience that the jury is simply more likely to accept the “neutral” determinations of a government health department over paid experts. One excellent example arose out of an E. coli outbreak in Washington State in 1998. State and local health officials who investigated the case concluded that the source of the outbreak was a ground beef meal prepared and served at an elementary school. Eleven children were identified as either “confirmed” or “probable” victims of the outbreak. All except one of them attended the school. Four of the children developed hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), which resulted in varying degrees of permanent kidney damage.

Interestingly, the child with the most severe injuries was the one who did not attend the school and did not eat the implicated meal. The child’s older sister, however, did attend the school and had eaten the meal. It was our position that this non-student had been infected via exposure to her sister or another student, a phenomenon known as “secondary infection.” The school district took issue with nearly every aspect of the case and, in doing so, attacked the health department’s conclusions. The defendant even contended that the tacos were not the source of the outbreak, that the non-student had not been infected with the bacteria. The jury, however, believed the health department investigation, and issued a multi-million dollar award to the injured children.

Health departments insist on virtual certainty before they declare an outbreak, or pinpoint a restaurant as the “confirmed” source. Without 95 percent confidence in a particular conclusion, health departments are likely to define individuals or outbreaks as “possible.” This is the case even where the confidence in a particular conclusion is well above the legal standard. This works both ways; if health authorities investigate and find a claimant’s illness did not come from a particular source, the plaintiff faces the same uphill battle.
Related Posts

CNN Special Unit Investigation - Spinach

CNN Special Unit Investigation:  Saturday, May 19, & Sunday, May 20:  8 p.m. & 11 p.m. EST

I was interviewed for this story - it will be interesting to see how much of the interview is used.
Related Posts

Raw oysters cause Hepatitis A among Arizonans, including Yuma County resident

It would figure that the CDC claims this to be Hepatitis Awareness Month --- May 2007

Health officials are warning people not to eat raw shellfish after 13 Arizonans, one of them a Yuma County resident, contracted hepatitis A from eating uncooked oysters at Rocky Point, Son., in March. "These cases are a reminder that there is a real risk of getting sick from uncooked shellfish, regardless of where it came from," state epidemiologist Ken Komatsu said in a news release.

More Hepatitis News for this month:

Canada Restaurant patrons warned about Hepatitis A

Hundreds of diners were potentially exposed to hepatitis A for two weeks by an infected food handler at a southwest restaurant, say Calgary Health Region officials. Those who ate at the Wildwood Grill and Brewing Co. from April 30 to May 13 are being urged to get a vaccination at a clinic at 1509 Centre St. N. between 5 p.m. and 9 p.m. The restaurant — at 2417 4 St. S.W. — has been closed for disinfection and should have a clean bill of health once it re-opens, said Dr. Judy MacDonald, the CHR’s deputy medical officer of health.

Related Posts

The Science and Law of Tracking Foodborne Illness - Part 2

The Legal Process:  Tools used in evaluating claims of foodborne illness

It is predictable that some people are inclined to issue claims of dubious legitimacy, or that are simply fraudulent. In our work as litigators, we see no shortage of bogus claims.   There are claims that food looked or “smelled funny,” claims of finding foreign objects in one’s food, and other non injury-causing events that we see and dismiss virtually every day.

In our experience, food industry corporations over-emphasize, and thus overreact, to such claims, essentially responding in the same manner to legitimate and illegitimate complaints.  But denying legitimate claims increases the likelihood of failure to enact important measures to improve food safety. Not improving food safety increases the risk of poisoning consumers and resulting litigation. Litigation not only carries its own expenses, but the threat of public relations headaches as well. The industry should understand some of the reliable methods for recognizing suspect food poisoning claims.

Incubation Period


Take, for example, incubation period – the time between ingestion of a foodborne pathogen and the onset of symptoms.  These well-established periods are stated as ranges, not precise periods of time, but they still can be used to identify an improper claim. The claimant who insists that her E. coli O157:H7 illness was sparked by the hamburger she ate an hour before she got sick does not have a winnable case regardless of the damages because the incubation period of E. coli O157:H7 is one to ten days, typically two to five days.
   
Incubation Periods of Common Foodborne Pathogens:

Staphylococcus aureus - 1 to 8 hours, typically 2 to 4 hours
Campylobacter - 2 to 7 days, typically 3 to 5 days
E. coli O157:H7 - 1 to 10 days, typically 2 to 5 days
Salmonella - 6 to 72 hours, typically 18-36 hours
Shigella - 2 hours to 7 days, typically 1-3 days
Hepatitis A - 15 to 50 days, typically 25-30 days
Listeria - 3 to 70 days, typically 21 days
Norovirus - 24 to 72 hours, typically 36 hours

In most situations, bacteria will be undetectable by the consumer, which is an intrinsic risk to consumers in the first place. Therefore, customers who believe they were sickened because food tasted odd are usually wrong, but many consumers with legitimate complaints tend to retroactively assign a negative connotation to a meal once the health department has identified it as a source of an outbreak. This common response doesn’t necessarily eliminate a claim.

Related Posts

The Science and Law of Tracking Foodborne Illness - Part 1

I get asked quite often what I do and how I do it.  Below is the beginning of a ten part series that I have been working on - I hope you find it helpful.

Part 1

Introduction


Each year, about 76 million cases of foodborne illness occur in the United States, according to U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). That means one in four Americans contracts an illness each year by eating food that has been contaminated with such pathogens as E. coli, Salmonella, hepatitis A, Campylobacter, Shigella, Norovirus and Listeria. Most of those illnesses are relatively minor. But about 325,000 of these individuals will be hospitalized, and 5,000 will die. Billions of dollars will be spent on medical treatment and billions more lost in decreased food sales and, for the families of sick people, lost wages. When careless business practices poison customers, and when regulatory agencies do not have the manpower or ability to help business perform, people die and market share is lost, nationally and internationally.

Foodborne Illness: A changing landscape

The issue of food safety is not new. A century ago, Upton Sinclair exposed the corruption within the U.S. meat-processing industry that caused federal meat inspectors to turn a blind eye to contamination in his muckraking book, “The Jungle.” But some important changes have occurred since Sinclair’s book.

First, meat and meat processing are no longer the most common source of foodborne illness. Today that dubious distinction belongs to seemingly innocuous and healthful vegetables, including lettuce, spinach, sprouts, tomatoes, spinach, green onions and parsley – even almonds. In the past 10 years, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported 21 outbreaks related to fresh leafy products. Just last year, 205 people became sick and five died from eating E. coli-contaminated spinach. Late last year and throughout this year, the CDC reported that more than 425 people in 44 states became infected with Salmonella found in peanut butter, all traced to one processing plant in Georgia. More than 70 were hospitalized. From experience, we know cases of Salmonella are under-reported, so that it is likely that the number of people sickened may well have been more than 15,000.

More recently, we’ve seen an increase in the incidence of foodborne illness related to consumption of dairy products. In the Pacific Northwest and around the country, there have been more than 40 outbreaks of E. coli and other pathogens attributed to consumption of unpasteurized milk and other dairy products. In one recent case, 140 people reported consuming raw milk from a small family-owned dairy in Washington State; of these, 18 became ill with E. coli, and five of them were children under the age of 13.

The second new development in food safety is the result of the shrinking world and the global marketplace. Those new variables include the threat of terrorist attacks via the food network – a potential disaster that was probably not seriously contemplated before the horror of September 11. In addition, we are seeing the widespread growth of food imports, leading to problems such as a hepatitis A outbreak traced to green onions from Mexico and the illnesses and deaths of thousands of American pets traced to contaminated wheat gluten from China.

And finally, there’s the scientifically questionable but increasingly popular demand for “natural,” or unprocessed foods, such as raw milk or unpasteurized juice, or “environmentally friendly” practices such as recycling water or planting native grasses. Experience seems to be telling us that the benefits of such practices are often offset by the risks – particularly to children and others with compromised immune systems.

Given these changes, we shouldn’t be surprised that food safety has become, more than ever, a legal and political issue, as well as a question of personal and corporate ethics.
Related Posts

Backyard Waterslide as E. coli Culprit?

Brynn Galindo of KGET Reported - Health Department identifies E. coli source

Bakersfield's recent E. coli began at a backyard waterslide, the health department has announced. Health Director Dr. B.A. Jinadu emphasized there is no continuing danger to anyone who has not yet become sick.

"After a thorough investigation the Department of Public Health has identified that initial exposure occurred on April 26 at a water slide event, a known source of E. coli exposure in such a situation," according to a news release from the Health Department. "This started the chain of an infectious process which stretched from April 26 or May 4, where some of the cases became ill following these events. "Another significant event occurred on April 29, during which the same social circle attended that event. This proves to be an event point for secondary infection. The evidence also supports that the two patients that showed symptoms on April 27, a day following the waterslide event appeared to have been exposed at an earlier date and were infectious at the time of that event," the news release said.  Full Press Release From Kern County Here

Water is an easy way for microbes to get around – see the following cases:

Seneca Lake State Park Spraypark Cryptosporidium Litigation

During June, July, and August 2005, nearly 4,000 people became ill with Cryptosporidiosis after visiting the spraypark at Seneca Lake State Park in New York. The New York State Health Department determined that the spraypark's holding tanks were contaminated with Cryptosporidium, a parasite that causes gastrointestinal illness in humans, when ingested.

Marler Clark filed a class action lawsuit against the New York Office of State Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation in September 2005. The class action was certified in July of 2006, and the court is considering a motion asking that the State of New York provide notice of a potential claim to all persons exposed to Cryptosporidium at Seneca Lake State Park who reported their illness to the state health department.

Atlanta White Water Waterpark E. coli O157:H7 Litigation

In the summer of 1998, 26 children became ill from E. coli O157:H7 contracted while playing in the kiddie pool at White Water Park, a commercial water park in suburban Atlanta. Seven of those children were hospitalized and a 2-year-old boy died from Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome, a kidney disorder caused by E. coli O157:H7. Operators of the pool initially denied responsibility for the E. coli outbreak, but investigators determined that the chlorine level in the pool was well below the local health standard on the days when the water was contaminated, greatly increasing the risk of infection.

Marler Clark represented most of the victims and their families, eventually obtaining multi million dollar settlements. The incident increased national awareness of the hazards of water contamination, prompting the industry to pay closer attention to pool cleaning and chlorine.
Related Posts

Son's death from E. coli infection spurs activist

Barbara Kowalcyk (former client and friend), the former president of Safe Tables Our Priority (S.T.O.P.), a national grassroots organization dedicated to preventing foodborne illness, was interviewed by the Daily Record.  She recently co-founded a new nonprofit, the Center for Foodborne Illness Research and Prevention (CFI). Kowalcyk and her husband, Michael, came to S.T.O.P. in late 2001 after their 21⁄2-year-old-son, Kevin, died from an E. coli infection.

See Full Story
Related Posts

Attorney and food safety activist William Marler interviewed

Keith Roysdon of the Muncie, Indiana Star Press and I talked candidly about food safety last week. Here is part of the story:

Companies, government must do more to increase food safety, expert says
Attorney and food safety activist William Marler  [of Marler Clark in Seattle Washington] uses an alarming comparison when urging people not to eat bagged spinach. "Buying spinach is like being married to the same person for 30 years," Marler said. "But buying bagged spinach is like dating 30 people in a month."

A Washington attorney whose clients -- including members of an Indiana family -- testified before Congress in food safety hearings in April, Marler said consumers should beware of some food items and corporate practices in the wake of tainted spinach and peanut butter that caused hundreds of people nationwide to become sick. But Marler and other experts say consumers can only do so much, and that government and industry must act to improve the safety and integrity of our food supply.

In the mid-1990s, tainted hamburger used at fast-food restaurants around the country killed five people and made more than 600 sick. Marler and other attorneys sued and won hundreds of millions of dollars for their clients, he noted. But almost more importantly, the federal government implemented programs -- including more food industry testing and mandatory reporting by doctors whose patients were sickened by tainted food -- that dramatically reduced the chance of illness-causing bacteria in meat. Marler noted that most of his cases are now sparked by tainted produce. What's needed? Improved industry safeguards and government oversight, Marler said.

"Everybody says it will cost money, but you tell me how much hamburger has gone up in price since the 1990s," Marler said. "The reality is that it didn't make a difference and they're producing a safer product. "The only difference is, they're not killing little kids anymore."

The number of foodborne illnesses linked to produce is not a surprise, Marler said. "As it relates to produce, it's the perfect storm," he said. "You've got an increase in consumer demand for fresh fruits and vegetables. You've got an increase in industrialization of that sector of the economy. There have been 23 outbreaks tied to spinach and lettuce in [10] years, all tied to product that has been bagged in a more mechanized, industrial manner and shipped across the country.

"What the industry needs to do is take a page out of the meat industry's book on how they've lessened the problem and cleaned up their act," he added. "If the produce industry took that model, if government mandated it and industry adopted it and government made sure they were doing it, it would put me out of business like the meat industry put me out of business."

I was also interviewed by Jessica Fargen of the Boston Herald last week as well in: What’s eating you?

“Whether it’s sprouts or peanut butter or orange juice, you can’t help yourself but go, ‘Oh my gosh, how did that happen? What’s safe?’” said William Marler, a Seattle attorney who has been retained by Bailey and her husband and about 100 other Bay State residents to sue ConAgra foods, owner of Peter Pan. “The American consumer gets mixed messages that our food is the safest in the world, but if you look at the state of things it’s really not that comforting,” he said.

Related Posts

May is Beef Month?

According to a Kansas newspaper – May is “Beef Month.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 73,000 cases of E. coli O157:H7 occur annually in the United States. Every year, 2,100 Americans are hospitalized, and 61 people die as a direct result of E. coli O157:H7 infections and its complications. A recent study estimated the annual cost of E. coli O157:H7 illnesses to be $405 million (in 2003 dollars). Those costs that contributed to this estimate included $370 million for premature deaths, $30 million for medical care, and $5 million for lost productivity. The CDC’s estimates of E. coli O157:H7 infections recently increased by 50%. In addition, it has been estimated that for every laboratory-confirmed E. coli O157:H7 infection, another 4-8 symptomatic cases are likely missed by current surveillance systems. (http://www.about-ecoli.com/)

I speak frequently on issues of safe food and formed Outbreak (www.outbreakinc.com), a non-profit business dedicated to training companies on how to avoid foodborne illness outbreaks. I also post on food-related issues on Marlerblog (www.marlerblog.com). My firm, Marler Clark has been involved in litigation stemming from the largest E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks across the country since the Jack in the Box outbreak of 1993. (http://www.marlerclark.com/news-ecoli.htm) Since 1993, Marler Clark has recovered nearly $300 Million from food companies on behalf of victims.

I was interviewed recently in – “Companies, government must do more to increase food safety, expert says."
Related Posts

Seems to be backsliding on E. coli in meat

From 1993 to 2002, most of the E. coli cases we did were from tainted hamburger.  Since 2002, most of the E. coli case have bee linked to spinach and lettuce.  Hopefully, the below reports are not a trend back in the wrong direction.

Kalamazoo company recalls 129,000 pounds of beef – two sickened

Davis Creek Meats and Seafood in Kalamazoo is voluntarily recalling approximately 129,000 pounds of beef products due to the possible contamination of E. coli. The problem was discovered after two people in the Kalamazoo area became sickened with symptoms related to the bacteria. The beef products were produced between March 1 and April 30, and were shipped to food service distribution centers and marketplace stores in Arkansas, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia and Wisconsin.

Strain of E. coli found – three sickened

County Public Health Officer Dr. B.A. Jinadu was cited as receiving confirmation about 5:45 p.m. Wednesday from his staff that E. coli O157:H7 has sickened at least three of the roughly 12 children
afflicted with a possible food-borne illness. Two have been released, and two developed hemolytic-uremic syndrome -- a condition marked by kidney failure and seen in serious food-borne illnesses -- and were transferred to hospitals outside Kern County.

E. coli O157:H7 cases linked to ground beef purchased at Lunds or Byerly’s stores since mid-April – 117,500 pounds of beef shipped to eight states -
seven sickened

Minnesota Department of Health and Agriculture officials are investigating seven cases of E. coli O157:H7 infection in Minnesota residents associated with eating ground beef purchased from Lunds or Byerly’s stores since mid-April. Routine monitoring by the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) found that the cases of illness were all caused by E. coli O157:H7 with the same DNA fingerprint. All of the cases had purchased the ground beef from one of four Lunds or Byerly’s stores in the west metro area since April 12. The people became ill between April 21 and 28 after consuming the meat. The cases include two children and five adults. Three of the cases were hospitalized, but all have been discharged.

E. coli scare changes menu at St. Helena Little League shack – 100,000 pounds of frozen ground beef patties - three sickened


Following reports early last month of E. coli infection in three Napa Valley children — who got sick from hamburger patties sold at a St. Helena Little League snack shack — Little League baseball spectators in St. Helena will no longer be able to buy a burger during game time. Gamble said the three confirmed reports of E. coli were in children between the ages of 8 and 12. The meat that sickened the children came from a Napa business, the Salami Lady’s Cash & Carry. Jan Dalluge, who has owned the business for five years, said she acquired the product from Richwood Meat Company of Merced.

Related Posts

Updated Beef recalled in Arizona, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Virginia and Wisconsin linked to illnesses in Minnesota


The meat company linked to an E. coli outbreak in the Twin Cities Minnesota is recalling 117,500 pounds of beef shipped to eight states, including Michigan, the U.S. Department of Agriculture said.  Health officials have said it appears that tainted ground beef from Lunds or Byerly's stores sickened seven people, including three who had to be hospitalized before they recovered.  The USDA notice issued late Thursday said PM Beef Holdings LLC of Windom is voluntarily recalling the beef trim products that were sent to distributors and retailers in Arizona, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Virginia and Wisconsin.  The USDA said the beef trim was produced March 27 and turned into ground beef sold under numerous retail brand names. In Minnesota, officials have said it was ground at the stores where it was sold.  See FSIS Release
Related Posts

EDITORIAL - CHICAGO TRIBUNE

On May 31st, I have the opportunity to host Senator Durbin in Seattle - here is why I would - Great editorial from the pages of the Chicago Tribune:

Durbin and the 'food czar'

Used to be that the word "czar" conjured up images of dashing Russian royals and their glamorous trappings -- Faberge eggs and glittering jewels.

These days, though, "czar" has morphed into Washington shorthand for a government job with a flashy title but little authority.

So it's appropriate that some people are sneeringly referring to the new senior position created by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as the "food safety czar."

The new assistant commissioner for food protection, Dr. David Acheson, is charged with guarding against hazards in the food supply. But there is no new muscle behind the title. The food czar has no authority to order a recall of a tainted food product. That, by current rules, is left to the food manufacturers. That can put manufacturers in a tough spot, given the high cost of a recall.

Congress is working to change that. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) introduced an amendment -- it passed last week on a 94-0 vote -- to the FDA reauthorization bill.

Durbin's amendment includes promising changes: creating a database of adulterated foods, allowing the FDA to better monitor patterns of problems and better target its scarce inspection dollars; requiring companies to improve their record-keeping, so that key documents are readily available in the case of a food emergency; and drafting uniform standards to govern the pet food industry, instead of relying on a hodgepodge of state regulations. The issue of giving the FDA the power to order recalls will be taken up by the Senate later this year.

The safety of our nation's food supply was called into question recently when pet food ingredients imported from China turned out to be tainted, sickening and killing animals. It's disturbing that the dangerous melamine also made its way into the human food supply when it was used as feed for 3 million chickens raised on Indiana poultry farms.

Last year, spinach contaminated with a toxic strain of E. coli affected consumers in different parts of the country. And five years ago, according to the Los Angeles Times, the U.S. followed the lead of the European Union and temporarily suspended imports of honey from China after it tested positive for a widely banned antibiotic.

By 2006, however, the U.S. was importing $27.3 million worth of honey from China. All told, China said it sent $3.8 billion worth of food exports to the U.S. last year, everything from sausage casings to canned mushrooms to apple juice. As more of our food -- human and animal -- is processed at fewer but bigger sources, the FDA needs the vigilance, competence and power to act quickly if it sees a problem somewhere in the supply chain.

Many food industry officials aren't opposed to that. Some food producers are among the most vocal advocates of increasing FDA funding. They would even support giving the FDA the power to force recalls. After all, they have a financial stake in maintaining consumer confidence in their products.

As Durbin and his counterpart in the House, Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), lead the way toward improving our nation's food supply, they should draw on the expertise of industry and food safety scientists to create a set of laws that are workable, efficient and effective.

The more robust FDA being proposed by Durbin and DeLauro would be better able not just to monitor food safety, but also to respond quickly when that safety is compromised. And it would give Acheson at least a small sliver of the power, if not the pageantry, befitting a czar.
Related Posts

Three cases of E. coli in Kalamazoo Michigan - Update

Three people in the Kalamazoo area have become sickened with symptoms related to E. coli. Two of those cases came from the same genetic type of bacteria.  According to Dr. Richard Tooker, the medical director of the Kalamazoo County Health Department,  these cases are a different source of contamination, compared to a recall announced Friday. That recall involved thousands of pounds of beef trim products from a company in Minnesota.

For more information on E. coli, see www.about-ecoli.com and for medical complications, see www.about-hus.com.  FSIS Recall information.
Related Posts

Beef Plant Linked To E. Coli Cases Up And Running in Minnesota

Production was continuing at the PM Beef plant linked to seven E. coli illnesses, the company said on Thursday.  PM Beef spokeswoman Lisa Hernandez said the plant is working with federal and state authorities on the matter, but in the meantime, the plant has not shut down.  State health officials said seven people were sickened by E. coli O157:H7 bacteria. All involved ground beef purchased since April 12 from one of four Lunds or Byerly's stores in the western Twin Cities and supplied by PM Beef. Three of those who got sick were hospitalized, but all have since been discharged.  The U.S. Department of Agriculture is leading the investigation, but it has not said whether other sellers received meat that may have been contaminated.
Related Posts

E. coli Pizza Connection? - UPDATE


New Pizza Outbreak Update - General Mills Totinos Pizza

General Mills is the “sixth largest food company in the world” with revenues for 2007 estimated to be nearly $12,500,000,000. General Mills announced today that since July 1 of this year, it had distributed more than 120 million Totino's and Jeno's pizzas nationwide. Surprisingly, in light of 21-reported E. coli illnesses tied to these products, General Mills has only recalled 5 million of the 120 million pizzas produced. “General Mills should immediately expand the recall to all 120 million pizzas produced during the time-frame that people were sickened,” said Bill Marler, the Seattle attorney who has dedicated his law practice to representing victims of E. coli outbreaks. According to the CDC, the earliest case was reported on July 20, and the latest was reported on October 10. The ten states reporting illness are, Illinois (1), Kentucky (3), Missouri (2), New York (2), Ohio (1), Pennsylvania (1), South Dakota (1), Tennessee (8), Virginia (1), and Wisconsin (1).

Marler also called on General Mills to immediately pay medical costs for the victims of the E. coli outbreak. “Without assistance in the form of monetary compensation for medical expenses, many of the families with members who were hospitalized will face financial hardship in the coming months when the bills start coming in,” said Marler. “General Mills should do the right thing and begin compensating victims of this outbreak for those most basic needs now,” Marler added.

Marler noted that other companies like Dole, Odwalla, ConAgra and Jack in the Box willingly paid medical bills when their products were identified as the source of E. coli outbreaks. “General Mills knows it’s going to pay those medical expenses in the end in the form of a settlement or jury verdict,” Marler continued. “The question is, since they know their product was the cause of these illnesses, why wait?”

Several times a month Bill speaks to industry and government throughout the United States on why it is important to prevent foodborne illnesses. He is also a frequent commentator on food litigation and safety on www.marlerblog.com. Bill also sponsors several websites related to E. coli, including www.about-ecoli.com, www.about-hus.com and www.ecoliblog.com.  Bill can be reached at bmarler@marlerclark.com or 1-206-346-1890

According to KGET TV in Bakersfield - Children recovering from E. coli contamination

Video Watch This Video

Four local children remained hospitalized Wednesday and eight more continued to recover from symptoms linked to E. coli contamination.  A common thread is a restaurant in Bakersfield, but the Kern County Health Department will not reveal its location.

Child's condition fair in E. coli scare

| Sunday, May 13 2007 10:30 PM

Last Updated: Sunday, May 13 2007 10:35 PM

The 6-year-old Ronald Reagan Elementary School kindergartner sickened in the recent E. coli scare is in fair condition, which means his vital signs are stable, he is conscious but may be uncomfortable. The boy is one of four children who have been hospitalized.


Related Posts

LONGVILLE MINNESOTA E. COLI OUTBREAK AND INVESTIGATION

We have the honor of representing several of the folks and families sickened in this needless E. coli outbreak from last summer.  Below is the write-up of our investigation:

In late July and early August 2006, the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) received three E. coli O157:H7 stool isolates from residents of, and visitors to, Longville, Minnesota. Pulsed-field gel electrophoreses (PFGE) patterns for all three were indistinguishable, and the pattern had never been seen before in Minnesota. At the same time, MDH learned of an outbreak of gastrointestinal illnesses among members of the Salem Lutheran Church in Longville. The church had served meals on July 10 and 19, and multiple congregation members subsequently fell ill with cramps and bloody diarrhea.

The MDH opened an epidemiologic and environmental health investigation of the three confirmed E. coli O157:H7 illnesses and the church outbreak. MDH obtained the member directory from the church and interviewed parishioners to obtain information concerning their attendance at church events along with a general food and activity history. In addition, an MDH sanitarian visited the Salem Lutheran Church to conduct an environmental assessment of the kitchen where the food for the July 19 meal had been prepared. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) contacted local grocery stores and restaurants to obtain information on the type and source of beef products involved.

MDA and MDH learned that ground beef used to make meatballs for the church meal, as well as the ground beef purchased by numerous area restaurants, was purchased at Tabaka’s Supervalu. On July 17, members of the church had purchased 40 pounds of ground beef from the Supervalu. MDA conducted an on-site inspection at the store on August 7, 2006.

MDH’s epidemiological investigation revealed seventeen illnesses that met the case definition. Of these, three people developed hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), and one patient died. Attendance at the church’s July 19 smorgasbord dinner was significantly associated with illness.

MDA conducted a traceback of the ground beef purchased at the Supervalu and used in the July 19 meal. The store had received approximately 1,900 pounds of chuck rolls from distributor Interstate Meat on July 10. The majority of the chuck rolls were ground into ground beef at the Supervalu. The Supervalu sold ground beef from the July 10 shipment to three Longville restaurants in the same time period as the sale to church members. Supervalu did not receive any chuck rolls from any distributor other than Interstate Meat in the weeks prior to the outbreak.

The MDA traceback of the chuck rolls from Interstate Meat revealed that the “most plausible” source of the chuck rolls delivered to the Supervalu was the Nebraska Beef processing plant. In addition to this, the USDA reported that a sample of beef trimmings collected on June 14, 2006 at a processing plant cultured positive for E. coli O157:H7, and that the isolate was indistinguishable by PFGE analysis to the outbreak strain. The processing plant was determined to be Nebraska Beef, the company that most likely supplied the implicated chuck rolls to Tabaka’s Supervalu.

Ultimately, MDH concluded that:

•“There was an outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 infections among members of the Longville, Minnesota community.
•Ground beef from Tabaka’s Supervalu was the “source of E. coli O157:H7 for this outbreak.”
•“The isolation of the rare outbreak PFGE subtype of E. coli O157:H7 from a sample of beef trimmings from a USDA-inspected plant in the weeks prior to the outbreak suggests that the chuck rolls that were used to produce the ground beef at the store were likely already contaminated when received by the store.”
•“…records that were available from the Tabaka’s Supervalu and [Interstate Meat] suggested that the ultimate source of the implicated chuck rolls was [Nebraska Beef].

Related Posts

Lunds and Byerly's E. coli Cases in Minnesota

From a Press Release from the Minnesota State Department of Health:

E. coli O157:H7 cases linked to ground beef purchased at Lunds or Byerly’s stores since mid-April - Product removed from store shelves; customers asked to return or destroy it


State health and agriculture officials are investigating seven cases of E. coli O157:H7 infection in Minnesota residents associated with eating ground beef purchased from Lunds or Byerly’s stores since mid-April.  Routine monitoring by the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) found that the cases of illness were all caused by E. coli O157:H7 with the same DNA fingerprint. All of the cases had purchased the ground beef from one of four Lunds or Byerly’s stores in the west metro area since April 12. The people became ill between April 21 and 28 after consuming the meat.  The cases include two children and five adults. Three of the cases were hospitalized, but all have been discharged.

“The stores currently involved include Byerly’s St. Louis Park, Byerly’s Minnetonka, Byerly’s Chanhassen and Lunds Edina. However, we can’t be certain that meat from other stores is not involved, since all of the beef used for ground beef for Lunds and Byerly’s stores comes from a single processing facility,” said Heidi Kassenborg, Acting Director of the Dairy and Food Inspection Division of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA).

Ground beef that was purchased after April 7 from a Lunds or Byerly’s store, whether still in the refrigerator or freezer, should not be used, but should be discarded or returned to the store, officials said.  As a precautionary measure, Lunds and Byerly’s have voluntarily removed many varieties of ground beef from all of their stores and are cooperating fully with the investigation.

Lunds and Byerly’s customers are urged to return or destroy fresh ground beef purchased at any of their stores since April 7, 2007. This includes ground beef purchased fresh then frozen at home. It includes fresh beef patties, fresh or frozen meatloaf and ground chili meat.

Related Posts

E. coli Outbreak in Bakersfield California

Several children hospitalized following possible E. coli outbreak

The Health Department is investigating what may be an E. coli outbreak that has hospitalized several children, mostly from the same Bakersfield school.  Health Director Dr. B.A. Jinadu declined to name the school and said it's not even certain the illnesses are E. coli.  But six kindergarteners are sick, some of them hospitalized with the sometimes fatal disease of HUS.  An eighth student is a 10-year-old relative of of one of the kindergarteners.
Related Posts

E. coli scare changes menu at Little League


Natalie Hoffman, of the Register wrote this moring that:

Following reports early last month of E. coli infection in three Napa Valley children -- who got sick from hamburger patties sold at a St. Helena Little League snack shack -- Little League baseball spectators in St. Helena will no longer be able to buy a burger during game time.

The meat that sickened the children came from a Napa business, the Salami Lady's Cash & Carry. Jan Dalluge, who has owned the business for five years, said she acquired the product from Richwood Meat Company of Merced. She said meat from Cash & Carry has never before been linked to E. coli contamination.  Multiple calls to Richwood Meat Company were not returned. But according to Richwood's Web site, the company "has voluntarily recalled approximately 107,000 pounds of ground beef products processed on April 28, 2006."  The recalled products were hamburger patties and ground beef with the following names on the label: Fireriver, Chef's Pride, Ritz Food, Blackwood Farms, California Pacific Associates, C & C Distributing, Golbon and Richwood.
Related Posts

20 million chickens may have eaten tainted feed

Cats, dogs, pigs and now chickens

Our government on Friday placed a hold on 20 million chickens raised for market in several states because their feed was mixed with pet food containing an industrial chemical. Three government agencies — the Agriculture Department, the Food and Drug Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency — are overseeing a risk assessment to determine whether the chickens would pose a threat to human health if eaten, USDA spokesman Keith Williams said. The assessment may be completed as early as Monday. Federal investigators have been trying to determine how much of the tainted pet food had been used in feed for hogs and chickens. Hog farms in at least six states may have received tainted pet food for use in feed. Those animals also have been barred from market.

My questions are why was the tainted pet food being fed to chickens and hogs? Was this a normal part of their diet? Or, were the chickens and hogs being feed the “recalled” pet food?

Although the risk of human illness seems low, this pet food scandal only points to the many holes in our food safety system, especially related to imports.  Again, I would really like to know if these food animals were being feed "recalled," "left-over" pet food that was known to be contaminated with melamine.
Related Posts

Houlihan's Hepatitis A Class Action Lawsuit Continues


I spoke with Paul Dailing of the Chronicle yesterday about the status of the Class Action (Full Story Here).  The defendants had moved to dismiss the case, claiming that my clients were not injured as a result of the restaurant allowing a Hepatitis A infected employee to work, thereby exposing some 4,000 customers to Hepatitis A.  A few excerpts:
Attorney William Marler of the Seattle-based law firm Marler Clark, which specializes in food cases, filed the lawsuit Jan. 26 on behalf of Geneva resident Rebecca Johnson and her family.

“We filed it as a class action, but ultimately the judge has to certify it as a class,” Marler said.

“The damages are the cost of the shot if they actually had to pay for it, the time away from work or the time away from your family, the inconvenience of having to come in for that and the worry of waiting for weeks to see if the [immunoglobulin] shot worked,” Marler said. Marler said damages in similar cases have resulted in payments of $250 to $400 to each customer.

“Exactly what a court or a jury would award a class action like this is going to be depending upon what a jury thinks ... what that is worth,” he said.
Interesting article from this mornings LA TImes:

Supervisors can't require hepatitis A vaccinations

The county cannot legally require food workers to be vaccinated against hepatitis A, and overseeing a large-scale vaccination program for up to 400,000 workers would be complicated and expensive, according to a county health report issued this week.  The report was produced for the county Board of Supervisors after concern in recent months about a series of hepatitis outbreaks at restaurants and catered events across Los Angeles.  The report concluded that only the state could require vaccinations for food workers.

Related Posts

FDA says chickens' food had melamine

First is was cats and dogs, then pigs and now chickens - just how safe is the US food supply?

The Washington Post reported this morning, in part:
At least 2.5 million broiler chickens from an Indiana producer were fed pet-food scraps contaminated with the chemical melamine and subsequently sold for human consumption, federal health officials reported Tuesday. Hundreds of other producers may have similarly sold an unknown number of contaminated poultry in recent months, they added, painting a picture of much broader consumption of contaminated feed and food than had previously been acknowledged in the widening pet-food scandal.

100,000 Indiana chickens that ate the melamine-laced food and are still alive have been quarantined and will be destroyed as a precautionary measure, as will any other animals that turn up as the investigation continues to expand.

Related Posts

FDA appoints Acheson food-safety czar - Update



Gregory Lopes of the Washington Times reports tomorrow that the beleaguered Food and Drug Administration yesterday created a new post to defend the nation against contaminated products in the wake of safety scandals ranging from pet food to peanut butter.  The primary agency in charge of the nation's food supply is taking the first proactive step since the food safety crisis began by naming David Acheson as the first assistant commissioner for food protection, the FDA announced yesterday.
Dr. Acheson will "provide advice and counsel to [FDA Commissioner Andrew C. von Eschenbach] on strategic and substantive food safety and food defense matters," the agency said.

The announcement is the first step the agency has taken since the food safety crisis began last summer when E. coli bacteria was found in bagged spinach in 26 states. The incident was followed by a salmonella outbreak in Peter Pan peanut butter, and problems have carried over into this year when it was discovered pet food contained a dangerous chemical that now could find its way into human food.

Wasn't it Dr. Acheson who had that great response when asked if spinach was now safe?  His response was "it is as safe as it was before the outbreak."  So, what happened to the last Czar?

Seattle Times weighed in this last Sunday:

Don't gag, but food czar needed


The Food and Drug Administration's new focus on food safety, especially on imports, is overdue. But meaningful progress will be made only when Congress allocates more resources to increase inspections and create a surveillance system to spot problems early.

Related Posts

Request Free Information

Bill Marler Twitter Feed

    See More