A Penny for Education

I-884, the Education Trust Fund Initiative, raises the sales tax from 6.5 to 7.5%. Sure, no one likes taxes, but there are times when we really need to invest in our kids' future, and that time is now. The Trust Fund creates 10,000 high-quality preschool places, so poor kids get a good start. In kindergarten through high school, the Trust Fund helps reduce class size, increase teacher pay - specifically those who become board certified or who teach in math and science. The Trust Fund also creates 32,000 more places in our community colleges and universities, so quality students are not turned away. The Trust Fund expands finanical aid and increases the scholarships from the top 15% to the top 30% of high school graduates, so they can afford to attend. Finally, the Trust Fund invests in university based research that will generate new businesses and jobs. It is time for us to stop just "talking the talk" about education being the key to our future and "walk the walk" by stepping up and investing a penny for education.

Bill Marler

Related Posts

The Truth About the Civil Justice System

Supporters of so-called tort 'reform' bills in Congress claim that too many lawsuits have led to excessive costs and delays. They also charge that juries can no longer be trusted to render fair verdicts. But the truth belies these assertions. Tort 'reform' -- really 'deform' -- would gut our system's ability to force wrongdoers to change their harmful conduct. For the whole story, check out the facts below:

Related Posts

McDonald's Callousness Was Real Issue, Jurors Say, In Case of Burned Woman

The Wall Street Journal article "McDonald's Callousness Was Real Issue, Jurors Say, In Case of Burned Woman" sheds some much-needed light on the McDonald's coffee case.

When a law firm here found itself defending McDonald's Corp. in a suit last year that claimed the company served dangerously hot coffee, it hired a law student to take temperatures at other local restaurants for comparison.

After dutifully slipping a thermometer into steaming cups and mugs all over the city, Danny Jarrett found that none came closer than about 20 degrees to the temperature at which McDonald's coffee is poured, about 180 degrees.

Despite these findings, McDonald's refused to settle out of court. Apparently, they didn't think a jury would "punish a company for serving coffee the way customers like it." And at first, that's how jurists felt. Then they learned the facts.

What the jury didn't realize initially was the severity of her burns. Told during the trial of Mrs. Liebeck's seven days in the hospital and her skin grafts, and shown gruesome photographs, jurors began taking the matter more seriously. "It made me come home and tell my wife and daughters don't drink coffee in the car, at least not hot," says juror Jack Elliott.

Even more eye-opening was the revelation that McDonald's had seen such injuries many times before. Company documents showed that in the past decade McDonald's had received at least 700 reports of coffee burns ranging from mild to third degree, and had settled claims arising from scalding injuries for more than $500,000.

Related Posts

THE "MCDONALD'S COFFEE CASE"

The Center for Justice & Democracy has published a story called MYTHBUSTER! THE MCDONALD'S COFFEE CASE" AND OTHER FICTIONS to tell the true story of the often misunderstood and misrepresented case of the 79-year-old woman who sued McDonalds after she received third-degree burns over 16 percent of her body from spilled coffee.

The "McDonald's coffee" case. We have all heard it: a woman spills McDonald's coffee, sues and gets $3 million. Here are the facts of this widely misreported and misunderstood case:


Stella Liebeck, 79 years old, was sitting in the passenger seat of her grandson's car having purchased a cup of McDonald's coffee. After the car stopped, she tried to hold the cup securely between her knees while removing the lid. However, the cup tipped over, pouring scalding hot coffee onto her. She received third-degree burns over 16 percent of her body, necessitating hospitalization for eight days, whirlpool treatment for debridement of her wounds, skin grafting, scarring, and disability for more than two years. Morgan, The Recorder, September 30, 1994. Despite these extensive injuries, she offered to settle with McDonald's for $20,000. However, McDonald's refused to settle. The jury awarded Liebeck $200,000 in compensatory damages -- reduced to $160,000 because the jury found her 20 percent at fault -- and $2.7 million in punitive damages for McDonald's callous conduct. (To put this in perspective, McDonald's revenue from coffee sales alone is in excess of $1.3 million a day.) The trial judge reduced the punitive damages to $480,000. Subsequently, the parties entered a post-verdict settlement. According to Stella Liebeck's attorney, S. Reed Morgan, the jury heard the following evidence in the case:

Related Posts

Tomato supplier for Sheetz ceases operations, blames bad publicity

In a Pittsburgh Post-Gazette story Tomato supplier for Sheetz ceases operations, blames bad publicity, Joe Fahy and Jerome Sherman reported today that Coronet Foods, tomato distributer for sandwiches sold at Sheetz convenience stores, was ceasing operations today at its plant in Wheeling, West Virginia, leaving 220 workers without jobs. The company blames its going out of business on bad publicity from this summer's salmonella outbreak that sickened more than 400 people, about 330 Pennsylvanians and another 80 people in nearby states.

Marler's Seattle-based firm has filed three lawsuits as a result of the outbreak, all targeting Coronet. He said the company's decision to go out of business would not affect the lawsuits.
"Coronet has enough insurance to resolve all the claims," he said. "We're hopeful we can eventually get through this, either by litigation or settlement."
Related Posts

What She Ate Almost Killed Her

In a tragic story of how our food system fails families, Madeline Drexler's article "What She Ate Almost Killed Her" for Good Housekeeping paints the painful tale of one little girl's battle with death, all because she ate a hamburger.

On June 30, 2002, ConAgra recalled 354,200 pounds of ground beef. On July 16, Kristi Thacker purchased a five-pound package of ConAgra ground beef, packaged under a store-brand name, from her local grocery store. Three days later ConAgra expanded its recall, but Kristi Thacker didn't hear about the recall until early September, about a month after she cooked the contaminated meat and fed it to her family. On August 14, five-year-old Savana Thacker got sick. Within a week, she was hospitalized with kidney and liver failure, complications of HUS caused by E. coli toxins poisoning her young body.

"Usually, I take things as they roll," Kristi says now. "But this time, I literally felt ill." Her husband, Shelby, got mad. "He wanted to know why, where, how. Who could have done this to us?"
The answer: our government's lack of mandatory recall, and a voluntary recall process shrouded in secrecy.

For one, recalls are voluntary: No federal agency can order a manufacturer to pull a contaminated food product from the market, with the exception of infant formula; it can only request that the item be removed.


More alarming, the process is shrouded in secrecy. You may hear the name of the manufacturer mentioned on a TV report or read about it in the paper. But unless your local market chooses to identify itself, you won't learn that the store has sold potentially lethal meat. It is no surprise, then, that only a small percentage of recalled foods is ever accounted for. The rest may have already been consumed or disposed of by the retailer or restaurant. Or it may wait in freezers in private homes.

We've seen these tragic cases in children before. A year before Savana got sick, two-year-old Kevin Kowalcyk died from a strain of E. coli that matched that from a recalled batch of meat manufactured by Green Bay Dressed Beef (which does business under the name American Foods Group). When his mother tried to find out where the firm had distributed the meat, she was stonewalled by state health officials.

Last July, with no other way to get the information, her attorney, William Marler, filed a lawsuit against American Foods Group and against the grocery store where Barbara regularly bought ground beef. "It is ridiculous that a grieving family would have to jump through the number of hoops we've had to, to find out what made our son sick," Barbara says. "They don't understand that when something like this happens to your child, you need to know."

Until our government changes its system, kids will continue to die from the dangerous dishes served to them at family meals, school lunches, fast food establishments. We've seen kids with HUS sickened and killed from E. coli contaminated hamburger, juice, milk, spinach. It's everywhere, and until the government sets higher standards, requires regular inspections and makes recalls mandatory, eating will continue to be a dangerous game for the American family.

Related Posts

The Essential Summer BBQ Accessory

Going to a BBQ? Bring your meat thermometer, The Essential Summer BBQ Accessory.

"The only safe hamburger is one cooked to 160 degrees," says Nancy Donley, president of the nonprofit Safe Tables Our Priority, a food-safety advocacy group. "Research has shown color is not a reliable indicator."

Donley learned about food safety the hard way seven years ago when her 6-year-old son died of HUS from eating an E. coli contaminated hamburger.

What worries Donley is that the E. coli situation may not have improved much, despite a number of well-publicized cases, including a 1993 outbreak linked to undercooked burgers from Jack in the Box restaurants and a spate of 1996 cases linked to Odwalla brand fruit juice.

Donley says that about half the cattle that come in for slaughter have some exposure to E. coli, and that ground meat samples tested by the federal government are turning up higher amounts of bacteria than before -- although this may be because of better testing.

"The slaughterhouse market is relatively unchanged since Sinclair Lewis wrote The Jungle," says Bill Marler, a Seattle attorney who has represented victims of some of the most notorious food poisoning cases of the last decade, including the Jack in the Box and Odwalla cases. He holds this opinion despite the fact that some plants have adopted new Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) quality-control procedures to keep contamination down.


"The concept is great," Marler says. "You look at those particular areas with the potential for contamination and focus on it and deal with it. In reality, it still takes a commitment by the company." Still, he adds, "I think you have got to have oversight in addition to HACCP. You can't let your own industry regulate itself."

As consumers, we can't trust that what we're eating is safe.

Proper cooking is of key importance, but it's not the only thing. Raw meat should be handled very carefully, all the way from the grocery story to the plate.

Related Posts

Swinging from the Chandeliers

Here at Marler Clark, we like to take swinging from the chandeliers to a whole new level, especially when the swinging is for a good cause like the BRIBE committee.

Like Tennessean Andrew Jackson's drunken supporters swinging from chandeliers at the rowdy 1829 White House inauguration bash that signaled the defeat of the snobbish East Coast Whigs, Seattle's rabble took over the 66th-floor law offices of Marler Clark on Wednesday night, January 28.


Bringing Real Integrity Back to Elections, or BRIBE, a committee founded by the Stranger news squad, hosted the shindig to raise money for bus ads that will publicize Mayor Greg Nickels' heavy-handed efforts to influence new city council members Jean Godden and Tom Rasmussen. The Stranger broke the story about Nickels' December 10 fundraiser, where the mayor rounded up nearly $10,000 to pay down Godden's and Rasmussen's campaign debts. Nickels erased nearly 20 percent of Godden's debt. You've gotta wonder if Godden's subsequent performance, running rubber-stamp confirmation hearings for Nickels' Seattle City Light nominee, was influenced by the mayor's generosity.


BRIBE's bash was held in the same Bank of America Tower law office as Nickels' fundraiser--attorney Bill Marler's wood- paneled spread, with its wide-screen TVs and panoramic city views. (The fun-loving Marler offered the digs after we started bashing Nickels' fundraiser and threatening to hold our own.)

Related Posts

The Puzzle of the Jury Room

In the article "A New Day In Court" published in CFO Magazine, Steven L. Mintz writes:

Awards often seem mysterious to Chris Campos, whose Teaneck, New Jersey based CPA firm, Campos & Stratis, investigates product- liability claims on behalf of insurance companies. He finds even favorable outcomes puzzling, when emotions in the jury room overwhelm, or at least temper, the facts. "You're almost shooting craps," he says, noting one Indiana case in which Campos was acting on behalf of an insurer suing a manufacturer to recover damages. His client claimed $2.8 million in damages caused by the manufacturer. "Instead of $2.8 million, they came back with $2.1 million. No one could explain why."

The article goes on to talk about a popular defense attorney opinion that personal injury attorneys tug at jury's heartstrings by pushing punitive awards as a way to "send a message back to the company."

I said:

"I think that a lot of times, company executives are not really thinking of what cases are about," Marler says. Instead, the defense often gripes about attention-grabbing attorneys who yank jurors' heartstrings on the thinnest of pretenses. "They've got to get past that," Marler declares of the company executives and the attorneys on their side. "Jack in the Box poisoned and killed children; a child who survived is going to have long-term kidney problems," he declares, urging that companies accept even the harshest reality if it's the truth. So the right track for companies, Marler says, is to face up to legitimate claims, but stand firm beyond that.

"Fight bogus claims to the death; it doesn't benefit any of us to roll over," he argues. "But when you're caught with your pants down, settle."

Related Posts

Lawsuit juries harder to find

If you think it's hard to get a fair trial in Texas, read Andrew Tilghman's article "Lawsuit juries harder to find" published in the Houston Chronicle.

In a drug-injury lawsuit brought by a terminally ill woman against Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, which makes the controversial drug fen-phen, state District Judge Elizabeth Ray reportedly summoned a pool of 93 prospective jurors to her Houston court but still couldn't find an impartial group of 12.

"They stood and said, `I hate lawsuits, I hate plaintiffs' lawyers and I hate plaintiffs, and I don't think they should even be at the courthouse.' - Ray said. "I thought, `Uh-oh. I can't have that guy because he can't be fair.' -

"To some people, this is jackpot justice," said George Fleming, the attorney representing the terminally ill woman in Ray's court last week. "People have listened to enough of the debate in Harris County to where they are taking views into the courtroom that are not consistent with the way the law is in Texas."

Pain and suffering at the hands of drug companies, according to Tilghman's article, is taking a back seat in consumer's minds to how big money awards will drain their own pockets.

"Jurors are more sophisticated. They start to think: `How does this affect me? If I give this guy $1 million, that is going to affect my cost of living,' - said Dallas lawyer Tom Fee, who handles civil defense.

It's unfortunate that so much of the American public has been poisoned into believing it's better to let corporations get away with injuring and killing our mothers, brothers and children rather than hold these companies financially responsible for their actions. Sadly, putting these companies in the public eye and tarnishing their images, as well as their bank accounts, through litigation is often the only way to get deadly drugs off the market.

I hope there never comes a day when I have to face a jury of tainted Americans who feel the corporations poisoning, often killing, children I represent in foodborne illness lawsuits are in the right by default. The families of these kids aren't in it for the "jackpot," and it's difficult to put a price tag on a toddler's lost kidneys or, worse, a child's life.

Related Posts

The RNC's Latest Political Target: Frivolous Lawsuits

Kevin Kelton, a political and humor columnist, wrote an interesting article called The RNC's Latest Political Target: Frivolous Lawsuits for the Washington Dispatch. It begins:

"First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers." Of course, after Shakespeare wrote that populist sound bite, Sir Francis Bacon took credit for his plays and Hollywood screenwriters took millions to "adapt" his works. Had he known, you think maybe the Bard would have found reason to spare the life of a good copyright lawyer or two?

Kelton goes on to address Republicans and their hypocritical tirades about frivolous lawsuits. As Kelton says, "Everyone loves to hate lawyers until they need them."

It's true; we do live in a litigious society. But trial attorneys are not the sole cause. Our capitalist system by its very nature pits companies against consumers, and the legal process is the only way to level the playing field.

Kelton talks about the exploding Ford Pintos, and how consumer lawsuits were what forced the company to step up and do the right thing. Same goes for dangerous drugs, deadly chemicals, and toxic products.

In those cases, trial lawyers weren't the enemy. They were the heroes. Today, whenever you hear of a defective product recall or a drug that is pulled from the market, you can bet it was a lawsuit (or several lawsuits) that made those companies reluctantly do the responsible thing.

Although Kevin Kelton's article doesn't mention the food industry specifically, it's true that his diatribe also applies to food producers and foodservice providers who poison consumers, and often kill kids, as well as to those "necessary evils" (lawyers like me) who often have to sue before a company steps up and does the right thing.

Related Posts

Felony counts filed over tainted lunch

Stephanie Banchero of the Chicago Tribune reported on October 9 that, in an unusual move, federal authorities have indicted a Downstate man on felony charges of conspiracy, transporting uninspected poultry and lying to federal authorities in a 2002 food poisoning incident that sickened more than 100 children and teachers at a Joliet school.

Edward L. Wuebbels of Albers is the third person to be criminally charged in one of the state's largest school food poisoning outbreaks. Wuebbels could get up to 16 years in prison if convicted on the six felony counts.

Two Illinois State Board of Education employees were indicted last year in the incident at Laraway Elementary School, which sent three dozen pupils to the hospital after they ate ammonia-tainted chicken tenders. Those misdemeanor cases are pending.

Bill Marler, a Seattle lawyer who has represented hundreds of children and families in lawsuits over food-borne illnesses, called the indictments "very unusual, but very welcome."

"It's about time someone cracked down on these people," said Marler, whose firm represented 35 pupils and teachers at Laraway School in a civil case that recently was settled for an undisclosed amount. "It is so rare that these people get charged. But in this case, I think it was so egregious that the government had no choice. I applaud them and wish we would see more of this."

The November 2002 incident at Laraway began when dozens of students ate a school lunch of chicken tenders and green beans. The children immediately began complaining of nausea and some vomited. A strong odor of ammonia was detected in the cafeteria.

The discovery of that the chicken was tainted, which Illinois health officials said showed ammonia contamination of up to 133 times the acceptable level, sent state education officials scurrying to gather up 360 cases of chicken tenders sent to 49 public schools, including 11 in the Chicago area.

Related Posts

Attorney says higher education needs citizen leadership

As Ann Strosnider, reporter for the Kitsap Sun, said in her story Attorney says higher education needs citizen leadership, I told a luncheon gathering of Olympic College supporters Monday that higher education faces a crisis in Washington state, and the state Legislature refuses to show any leadership.

"The stakes are enormous," the Bainbridge Island resident said, and that's why it's so important that citizens take matters into their own hands.

I spoke at the annual community luncheon, kicking off the campaign to raise funds for the Olympic College Foundation. The goal for the 2004-05 school year is to raise $150,000 for scholarships, programs and capital projects.


While the University of Washington and WSU are proud of the high grade-point averages of incoming freshmen, they are actually a barrier for many students.

"This year you had to have a 3.6 gpa to get into WSU or the UW," he said. "If that had been the requirement when I went to WSU, I would not be standing here today. ... College can't be just for the rich and those with a 4.0."

I'm a strong supporter of Initiative 884, which would raise state sales tax by 1 cent to create a $1 billion education trust fund for preschool, kindergarten through high school education and higher education. It would fund an additional 25,000 college and technical school enrollments and extend state Promise Scholarships to the top 30 percent of graduating high school classes.

"We've been pandered to for so long with the story that it's better to keep our money for ourselves," Marler told the gathering. "Now I have to ask, what are you doing to help? Will you show leadership?"
Related Posts

Distinguished graduate to speak

As Kitsap Sun Staff Writer Ann Strosnider has reported, I will be the featured speaker at the college's annual community luncheon Monday at Bremer Student Center.

The luncheon is the kickoff event to the annual fund-raising campaign for the Olympic College Foundation, which raises money for student scholarships and grants, program grants, and faculty development and training opportunities.

The 2004-2005 goal for the fund-raising drive is $150,000. Last year, 50 percent of fund-raising efforts came from the Community Luncheon.

The public is welcome at the luncheon. A $125 gift or pledge will be requested. All of the proceeds go to Olympic College students and programs.

What: Olympic College Community Luncheon

When: 11:45 a.m. Monday

Where: Bremer Student Center, OC Bremerton campus

Cost: A $125 gift or pledge is requested; proceeds go to OC students and programs

Sponsor: Olympic College Foundation

Reservations: Call (360) 475-7120

Related Posts

Parents sue Joplin day care

Globe Staff Writer Wally Kennedy has reported that the E. coli outbreak that hit a Joplin day-care center in May and June, affecting as many as 26 children, has generated its first lawsuit.

My firm filed this lawsuit against Kid's Korner Day Care Center last week on behalf of Patricia and Asa Wasden, parents of Ian Wasden, a 2-year-old boy who suffered from hemolytic uremic syndrome after contracting the E. coli bacteria in June. Health officials instructed the managers of Kid's Korner to notify the families of all children enrolled there of the outbreak to prevent illnesses, but the Wasdens never received notification from the center.

It wasn't until June 1, the date that Ian Wasden fell ill with symptoms related to his E. coli infection, that his parents learned about the outbreak.

Drew Falkenstein, a lawyer with Marler Clark in Seattle, said Wednesday in a telephone interview: "The day-care center was responsible for our client's E. coli infection under the facts that have been revealed.

"Where it came from, the mode of transmission into the day care, we are not sure. But, we do know our client's parents were not informed of the outbreak, and they are responsible for that and the child's subsequent infection."

Falkenstein said Ian Wasden was hospitalized for nearly three weeks, and that he went through a full week of kidney dialysis, seven blood transfusions, three surgeries and a severe case of pancreatitis.

Related Posts

Watch How Safe is your Burger?: KCTS 9 Connects on PBS. See more from KCTS 9 Lead Story.

Request Free Information

Bill Marler Twitter Feed

    See More